Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG16-51 VerbING part refers to which noun in a sentence?

Expert replies
by sunh0003 » Tue Jun 14, 2016 12:15 pm
I don't understand verbING refers to the true subject in the sentence? OR verbING refers to a noun that next to it? Thanks

OG16-51
Neuroscientist, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development for birth to adulthood, are now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain grows and how babies acquire language.
(A)Correct
(D) Neuroscientists have amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,
(OG explanation D, the final descriptor in present tense now drawing conclusions…does not fit the opening clause, which is in present-perfect tense (have amassed a wealth..) and seems to modify adulthood.)
My question is why drawing here is modifying adulthood rather than Neuroscientists?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Jun 15, 2016 3:32 am
sunh0003 wrote:OG explanation D, the final descriptor in present tense now drawing conclusions…does not fit the opening clause, which is in present-perfect tense (have amassed a wealth..) and seems to modify adulthood.)
My question is why drawing here is modifying adulthood rather than Neuroscientists?
The OE for D is incorrect.
A COMMA + VERBing modifier serves to refer to the PRECEDING SUBJECT and expresses an action that is CONCURRENT WITH the preceding action.

D: Neuroscientists have amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years, now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain grows and how babies acquire language.
Here, now drawing seems to refer to neuroscientists -- the preceding subject -- implying that neuroscientists are NOW DRAWING conclusions at the same time as an action that took place in the PAST (the amassing of knowledge over the past twenty years).
This sequence is illogical.
Eliminate D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by bonetlobo » Wed Jun 15, 2016 10:49 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote:implying that neuroscientists are NOW DRAWING conclusions at the same time as an action that took place in the PAST (the amassing of knowledge over the past twenty years).
This sequence is illogical.
Hello GMATGuruNY, had a related question. Wanted your opinion on this sentence:

Edward studied at St.Patrick's, graduating with distinction.

Here again, graduating with distinction happened later, while Edward studied at St.Patrick's in the past.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jun 16, 2016 4:41 am
bonetlobo wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:implying that neuroscientists are NOW DRAWING conclusions at the same time as an action that took place in the PAST (the amassing of knowledge over the past twenty years).
This sequence is illogical.
Hello GMATGuruNY, had a related question. Wanted your opinion on this sentence:

Edward studied at St.Patrick's, graduating with distinction.

Here again, graduating with distinction happened later, while Edward studied at St.Patrick's in the past.
The sentence above is incorrect.
On the GMAT, a COMMA + VERBing action must be CONTEMPORANEOUS with the preceding action.
Since the act of GRADUATING did not happen when Edward STUDIED, the sentence above is not viable.

A similar error can be found in SC29 in the OG15.
Check my post here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/emily-dickin ... 21769.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by bubblehead0922 » Tue Jan 10, 2017 11:50 am
Thx for your explanation. I had exact the same confusion. I like your explanation than OE.
GMATGuruNY wrote:
sunh0003 wrote:OG explanation D, the final descriptor in present tense now drawing conclusions…does not fit the opening clause, which is in present-perfect tense (have amassed a wealth..) and seems to modify adulthood.)
My question is why drawing here is modifying adulthood rather than Neuroscientists?
The OE for D is incorrect.
A COMMA + VERBing modifier serves to refer to the PRECEDING SUBJECT and expresses an action that is CONCURRENT WITH the preceding action.

D: Neuroscientists have amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years, now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain grows and how babies acquire language.
Here, now drawing seems to refer to neuroscientists -- the preceding subject -- implying that neuroscientists are NOW DRAWING conclusions at the same time as an action that took place in the PAST (the amassing of knowledge over the past twenty years).
This sequence is illogical.
Eliminate D.
Join the discussion