BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG11R-SC-73

Expert replies
by paes » Fri Jul 09, 2010 5:51 pm
Analysts blamed May's sluggish retail sales on unexciting merchandise as well as the weather, colder and wetter than was usual in some regions,which slowed sales of barbecue grills and lawn furniture.
(A) colder and wetter than was usual in some regions,which slowed
(B) which was colder and wetter than usual in some regions,slowing
(C) since it was colder and wetter than usually in some regions,which slowed
(D) being colder and wetter than usually in some regions,slowing
(E) having been colder and wetter than was usual in some regions and slowed


[spoiler]OA Later
Please explain A, B and C

[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by hardik.jadeja » Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:33 pm
Pick B.

A and C both are wrong because which at the end in both options incorrectly modifies region. It is supposed to modify weather.

B fixes this problem. The ing-modifier "slowing.." modifies the subject of the previous clause - "which". which refers to weather, so "slowing.." correctly modifies the weather.

Hope that helps..
Join the discussion

by apex231 » Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:52 pm
Yes, B is good.

(A) colder and wetter than was usual in some regions,which slowed
(B) which was colder and wetter than usual in some regions,slowing -> Correct.
(C) since it was colder and wetter than usually in some regions,which slowed
(D) being colder and wetter than usually in some regions,slowing
(E) having been colder and wetter than was usual in some regions and slowed
Join the discussion

by paes » Fri Jul 09, 2010 9:03 pm
Thanks Jadeja and Apex.

Jadeja,

You have given the perfect explanation which I was looking for.

So we can look B as :

Analysts blamed May's sluggish retail sales on <X> as well as the weather.
The weather (which) was colder and wetter than usual in some regions, slowing sales of <Y> .
Join the discussion

by gmat_perfect » Fri Jul 09, 2010 9:54 pm
paes wrote:Analysts blamed May's sluggish retail sales on unexciting merchandise as well as the weather, colder and wetter than was usual in some regions,which slowed sales of barbecue grills and lawn furniture.
(A) colder and wetter than was usual in some regions,which slowed
(B) which was colder and wetter than usual in some regions,slowing
(C) since it was colder and wetter than usually in some regions,which slowed
(D) being colder and wetter than usually in some regions,slowing
(E) having been colder and wetter than was usual in some regions and slowed


[spoiler]OA Later
Please explain A, B and C

[/spoiler]
Know the use of the two things clearly:

1. Comma + Verbing:

"Comma + Verbing" modifies the previous clause, which has a subject and a verb.

Look at the option D.

being colder and wetter than usually in some regions,slowing

Before slowing, there is no verb. being is not a verb. It is gerund. So D is out.

Look at B.
which was colder and wetter than usual in some regions,slowing

=> There is a verb "was" and subject "which" referring to weather. Keep it up.

2. Which:

Which refers to the immediate preceding NOUN.

Look at the options A and C. In both of the options "regions,which slowed" means that it is the region that slowed. It changes the meaning of the sentence. They are out.

Option E is simply awkward and not parallel.

Answer is B.
Join the discussion

by paes » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:11 am
Thnaks gmat_perfect,

But one thing which I don't agree with you is :

comma + ing modifies the previous claue --> most of the time true but not always true,
it can modify to the noun(without verb) also.
e.g.
The man, running on the road, was a thief.
Join the discussion

by hardik.jadeja » Sat Jul 10, 2010 9:00 am
paes wrote:Thnaks gmat_perfect,

But one thing which I don't agree with you is :

comma + ing modifies the previous claue --> most of the time true but not always true,
it can modify to the noun(without verb) also.
e.g.
The man, running on the road, was a thief.
gmat_perfect is actually correct. He is actually talking about adverbial modifiers.

"ing" words are pretty flexible. The "ing" form of a word can act as a gerund / noun / noun phrase (Running is fun), a verb (I am running fast), an adverbial modifier (I exercise regularly, running every morning), an adjective (The running man just robbed the bank)...

Most of the time, if you see a comma immediately followed by an -ing word, then you've got an adverbial modifier.

Coming to your sentence. I think the correct way to write it would be - The man running on the road was a thief - We do not need commas. The phrase running on the road is an adjective, not an adverbial modifier, and that's why it can modify a noun.

Hope that helps..
Join the discussion

by paes » Sat Jul 10, 2010 9:30 am
Jadeja,

putting a comma or not depends on whether it is a restrictive modifier or non restrictive modifier.

I have seen some examples in BTG only ( by some experts) where a comma + ing modifier was modifying to a noun.

I will point you the link if I could find it.

Currently I remember a problem from OG

Many people, willing to admit that they lack computer skills or other technical skills, are disinclined to recognize that their analytical skills are weak

https://www.beatthegmat.com/why-while-wi ... 39759.html
Join the discussion

by hardik.jadeja » Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:10 am
You didn't understand my point. I am not denying that ing-modifiers can modify nouns. In fact, the SC question posted at the start has an ing-modifier("slowing slaes..") that is modifying a noun(weather). I just said that maybe gmat_perfect is talking about adverbial modifiers. Adverbial modifiers can never modify immediately preceding nouns. As I said, "ing" words are pretty flexible and can perform different roles in different sentences.

Coming to your sentence, "willing to admit......" is a participial phrase. Participial phrases function as adjectives and that's why they modify nouns.

You posted this question couple of weeks back in some other discussion thread where Jen has answered your question.
Refer this thread: https://www.beatthegmat.com/help-with-mo ... tml#263042

The trick is to figure out whether the ing-modifier is functioning as an adjective or as an adverbial modifier.
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:22 am
Hardik and Paes, you people are correct, but there needs a deep analysis.

The man, reading this forum, is a GMAT aspirant.
A Man reading this forum is a a GMAT aspirant.

Both the sentences are correct. The only difference is the restriction. In first, the noun modifier is non restrictive (extra information) as we have a specific guy here.

The man is a GMAT aspirant----makes a perfect sense.

In second, the noun modifier is essential as we have to identify" who"

A man is a GMAT aspirant------incomplete sentence-----you would ask a obvious question who????
who is reading this forum

Note: in both the forms, the modifier needs to be close to the NOUN it modifies.

The two sentences can take another form as well.
The man, who reads this forum, is a GMAT aspirant.
A man who reads this forum is a GMAT aspirant.

Now, come to what we call ADVERBIAL MODIFIERS
The student learned all the concepts from this forum, scoring 700 in GMAT.
scoring 700 in GMAT is a adverbial modifier, which modifies the previous clause---in short gives the answer to the question--"how the student scored 700."----------and the answer we know is "by learning all the concepts".

The modifier here need not to be close to "the student" as it is not a noun modifier.

Now, a small test. Let us move this modifier close to the noun and see how the sentence looks like.

The student, scoring 700 in GMAT, learned all the concepts from this forum-----------would it make sense???
I do not think so. And this is how we can test this small puzzle.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1