Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

OG11 #99- Red Herring?

Expert replies
by VegasMBA » Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:10 pm
Hi Guys,

I tried to solve this problem and even after I read the explanation, I still could not figure out how to solve the question with the info given in the question. I understand the math in the explanation, in fact its quite simple.

How would you guys dice up this question? I feel like the n+1 info is a red herring...or am I completely missing the point?

On a scale that measures the intesity of a certain phenomenon, a reading of n+1 corresponds to an intensity that is 10 times the intensity corresponding to a reading of n. On that scale, the intensity corresponding to a reading of 8 is how many times as great as the intensity corresponding to a reading of 3?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

Problem Solving #99

by VegasMBA » Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:17 pm
Sorry for any confusion I may cause you. I thought I was already in the PS sub-forum.

The problem I am referring to is in the OG 11 #99 in problem solving
Join the discussion

Problem Solving #99

by VegasMBA » Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:18 pm
Sorry for any confusion I may cause you. I thought I was already in the PS sub-forum.

The problem I am referring to is in the OG 11 #99 in problem solving
Join the discussion

by bharathaitha » Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:41 am
reading at 8 is 10 times reading at 7. Reading at 7 is 10 times reading at 6 i.e. reading at 8 is 10^2 times reading at 6. Similarly if u solve further, u will figure out that reading at 8 is 10^5 times reading at 3.
Join the discussion

n+1

by VegasMBA » Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:27 am
So where does the "n+1" info come into play? That is what confused me when I read the question.
Join the discussion

by fatalmilk » Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:37 pm
The n+1 info is just to tell you that its the next corresponding reading on the scale. Without the n+1 info you wouldn't know what 10 times the intensity corresponds to and you would then have insufficient data to solve the problem.

Hope this makes sense to you now
Join the discussion

by just_do_it » Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:42 am
Assume the following,
intensity at reading n = x
therefore intensity at reading (n+1)=10x

n intensity
3 x
4 10x
5 100x, which is 10 times the intensity at n=4
6 1000x , which is 10 times the intensity at n=5
7 10000x , which is 10 times the intensity at n=6
8 100000x , which is 10 times the intensity at n=7

thus intensity at n=8 is 10^5 times the intensity at n=3.

Hope this helps.
Join the discussion

Thanks!

by VegasMBA » Sat Sep 06, 2008 9:17 am
Great, thanks so much guys!
That does make it clearer.
Join the discussion