If you have followed Ron's video about main idea and used the first para and the first sentense of the second para we can come to B in no time. I was able to make it Munda.

Why B? Please look for second para first line "has developed"
Why ~A? early scholers havent done anything wrong(limitations), they developed the old system but not to full extent.

HSPA wrote:If you have followed Ron's video about main idea and used the first para and the first sentense of the second para we can come to B in no time. I was able to make it Munda.

Why B? Please look for second para first line "has developed"
Why ~A? early scholers havent done anything wrong(limitations), they developed the old system but not to full extent.

Both the Approaches mentioned in the 1st para had limitations ie they did not recognize the political activities of women .
This is exactly what A is saying if you look at the objection objectively . I am not saying they did something wrong and nor does the passage .

The 2 entities that are discussed in the first para are schools of thought / approaches / ideas .
The 1st line of the second para says that paula Baker developed a political history . This is different from saying that Paula Baker developed a school of thought or idea . That is why i didnt consider B

Hi Munda,
I havent understood totally but from your first line you took
excluding women = Limitation; I think the passage has no proof for this. If it is there..kindly help me in pointing it out.

mundasingh123 wrote:

HSPA wrote:If you have followed Ron's video about main idea and used the first para and the first sentense of the second para we can come to B in no time. I was able to make it Munda.

Why B? Please look for second para first line "has developed"
Why ~A? early scholers havent done anything wrong(limitations), they developed the old system but not to full extent.

Both the Approaches mentioned in the 1st para had limitations ie they did not recognize the political activities of women .
This is exactly what A is saying if you look at the objection objectively . I am not saying they did something wrong and nor does the passage .

The 2 entities that are discussed in the first para are schools of thought / approaches / ideas .
The 1st line of the second para says that paula Baker developed a political history . This is different from saying that Paula Baker developed a school of thought or idea . That is why i didnt consider B

That they ignored the Activities of women is a Limitation.
Kindly Check the OE to Q27 at the link that i have provided above