BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG Seems to Ignore an Implied Restriction...

Expert replies
by Chriskahdian » Tue Nov 08, 2016 6:08 pm
OG 2016 Data Sufficiency #95

Each week a certain salesman is paid a fixed amount equal to $300, plus a commission equal to 5 percent of the amount of his sales that week over $1,000. What is the total amount the salesman was paid last week?
P = 300+(x-1000)*.05

1) The total amount the salesman was paid last week is equal to 10 percent of the amount of his sales last week.
2) The salesman's sales last week totaled $5,000.

My issue is with statement 1. I have no problem getting all that info into a mathematical expression:
1) 300+(x-1000)*.05 = .1x
Which is perfectly solvable, but my question is:

He must have sold over $1,000 to earn any commission. This seems to be ignored in the explanation, which solves the problem and lists 1) as sufficient. I myself actually did the same, and then realized that we don't know if he sold over $1,000, and went back on my answer for 1).

How do we explain this? Is it just, "don't overthink it," because that doesn't feel reliable enough...
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Nov 08, 2016 6:45 pm
Chriskahdian wrote:OG 2016 Data Sufficiency #95

Each week a certain salesman is paid a fixed amount equal to $300, plus a commission equal to 5 percent of the amount of his sales that week over $1,000. What is the total amount the salesman was paid last week?
P = 300+(x-1000)*.05

1) The total amount the salesman was paid last week is equal to 10 percent of the amount of his sales last week.
2) The salesman's sales last week totaled $5,000.

My issue is with statement 1. I have no problem getting all that info into a mathematical expression:
1) 300+(x-1000)*.05 = .1x
Which is perfectly solvable, but my question is:

He must have sold over $1,000 to earn any commission. This seems to be ignored in the explanation, which solves the problem and lists 1) as sufficient. I myself actually did the same, and then realized that we don't know if he sold over $1,000, and went back on my answer for 1).

How do we explain this? Is it just, "don't overthink it," because that doesn't feel reliable enough...
The salesman makes a base salary of $300.
Statement 1 indicates that his total earnings -- including his base salary -- are equal to 10% of his total sales.
Since 300 is 10% of 3000, his total sales cannot be less than $3000.

One way to evaluate Statement 1 is to test whether the value given in Statement 2 -- $5000 in sales -- is the ONLY value that will also satisfy Statement 1.

Statement 1: The total amount the salesman was paid last week is equal to 10 percent of the amount of his sales last week.
Case 1: Let his total sales = 5000, as indicated in statement 2.
Since he earns a 5% commission on all but the first $1000, his commission = 5% of $4000 = $200.
Total earnings = base salary + commission = 300+200 = 500.
Here, his total earnings (500) are equal to 10% of his total sales (5000).

Case 2: Let his total sales = 4000.
Since he earns a 5% commission on all but the first $1000, his commission = 5% of $3000 = $150.
Total earnings = base salary + commission = 300+150 = 450.
Here, his total earnings (450) are NOT equal to 10% of his total sales (4000).

Implication:
For his total earnings to be 10% of his total sales, his total sales must be 5000, as indicated in statement 2.
Thus, his total earnings = 500.
SUFFICIENT.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Chriskahdian » Tue Nov 08, 2016 6:56 pm
GMATGuruNY wrote: The salesman makes a base salary of $300.
Statement 1 indicates that his total earnings -- including his base salary -- are equal to 10% of his total sales.
Since 300 is 10% of 3000, his total sales cannot be less than $3000.

AHHHHHH, got it! Genius! Thank you! Plus that next level stuff, crazy
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Wed Nov 09, 2016 10:42 am
Hi Chriskahdian,

The information in the prompt provides enough information for us to create an equation for the salesman's pay: $300 + a 5% commission on any sales above $1000

300 + .05(X - 1000)

**It's important to note that if he sells less than $1000, there is no "penalty" (meaning that he won't lose money if he sells just $500).

The question asks for the amount the salesman was paid last week.

Fact 1: The salesman's pay last week = 10% of the total sales last week.

With this information, we can create a new equation...

.1X = 300 + .05(X - 1000)

This equation has just one variable, so we CAN solve it and there will be just one answer.
Fact 1 is SUFFICIENT

Fact 2: Total sales last week = $5,000

We can plug this info into the original equation and answer the question.
Fact 2 is SUFFICIENT

Final Answer: D

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion