• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• FREE GMAT Exam
Know how you'd score today for $0 Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Veritas GMAT Class Experience Lesson 1 Live Free Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Trial & Practice Exam BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • 5-Day Free Trial 5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Get 300+ Practice Questions 25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Magoosh Study with Magoosh GMAT prep Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Award-winning private GMAT tutoring Register now and save up to$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

## OG - SC Question 86

This topic has 3 expert replies and 2 member replies
Mission2012 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
19 Aug 2012
Posted:
184 messages
Followed by:
2 members
10
Test Date:
June '13
Target GMAT Score:
780

#### OG - SC Question 86

Wed Jul 24, 2013 10:36 am

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

# Global Stats

Difficult

In 2000, a mere two dozen products accounted for half the increase in spending on prescription drugs, a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing many more prescriptions for higher-cost drugs.
A. a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing
B. a phenomenon that is explained not just by the fact that drugs are becoming more expensive but also by the fact that doctors are writing
C. a phenomenon occurring not just because of drugs that are becoming more expensive but because of doctors having also written
D. which occurred not just because drugs are becoming more expensive but doctors are also writing
E. which occurred not just because of more expensive drugs but because doctors have also written

Can someone explain me what is wrong with option C

_________________
If you find my post useful -> please click on "Thanks"

### GMAT/MBA Expert

Rich.C@EMPOWERgmat.com Elite Legendary Member
Joined
23 Jun 2013
Posted:
9430 messages
Followed by:
480 members
2867
GMAT Score:
800
Wed Jul 24, 2013 6:26 pm
Hi Mission2012,

In answer C, there are a couple of problems:

1) The two phrases aren't parallel: "drugs that ARE BECOMING more expensive"...."doctors HAVING also written." The verb phrases don't match.
2) The word "also" is redundant.

The phrases need to be parallel and we have to avoid any redundancy. The correct answer is B.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich

_________________
Contact Rich at Rich.C@empowergmat.com

### GMAT/MBA Expert

GMATGuruNY GMAT Instructor
Joined
25 May 2010
Posted:
14164 messages
Followed by:
1818 members
13060
GMAT Score:
790
Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:40 pm
Mission2012 wrote:
C. a phenomenon occurring not just because of drugs that are becoming more expensive but because of doctors having also written

Can someone explain me what is wrong with option C
not just because of drugs but because of doctors.
Not the intended meaning.
The phenomenon is occurring not because of the drugs and the doctors themselves but because of what the drugs and the doctors are DOING.
not just is the equivalent of not only and must be followed by but also.

doctors having also written.
NOUN + HAVING + past participle is always incorrect.
also is misplaced: here, it must immediately follow but to form the idiom not just X but also Y.

_________________
Mitch Hunt
GMAT Private Tutor
GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon.
Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.

Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
Alex_Ivanov Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Joined
02 Aug 2013
Posted:
6 messages
Fri Aug 02, 2013 7:43 pm
Great explanation Mitch!

sinsofgmat Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Joined
05 Apr 2014
Posted:
17 messages
1
Sat Jun 14, 2014 12:42 pm
Mission2012 wrote:
In 2000, a mere two dozen products accounted for half the increase in spending on prescription drugs, a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing many more prescriptions for higher-cost drugs.
A. a phenomenon that is explained not just because of more expensive drugs but by the fact that doctors are writing
B. a phenomenon that is explained not just by the fact that drugs are becoming more expensive but also by the fact that doctors are writing
C. a phenomenon occurring not just because of drugs that are becoming more expensive but because of doctors having also written
D. which occurred not just because drugs are becoming more expensive but doctors are also writing
E. which occurred not just because of more expensive drugs but because doctors have also written

Can someone explain me what is wrong with option C
In option D and E, isn't there a problem with usage of "which" to refer back the entire clause preceding the comma.

In option C, isn't the tense of modifier "a phenomenon occurring" incorrect?

### GMAT/MBA Expert

Rich.C@EMPOWERgmat.com Elite Legendary Member
Joined
23 Jun 2013
Posted:
9430 messages
Followed by:
480 members
2867
GMAT Score:
800
Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:41 pm
Hi sinsofgmat,

Yes, all of the examples that you noted are errors in their respective answer choices.

The word "which" can be used as a pronoun, although it's a rarer issue on the GMAT. In this sentence it's improper to use any pronoun in that spot since there's nothing for the pronoun to refer to (so D and E have the same immediate problem).

Answer C has a couple of problems, including the one that you noted. I was drawn more to the non-parallel elements than to the incorrect use of "occurring."

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich

_________________
Contact Rich at Rich.C@empowergmat.com

### Top First Responders*

1 GMATGuruNY 68 first replies
2 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma... 48 first replies
3 Brent@GMATPrepNow 37 first replies
4 Jay@ManhattanReview 26 first replies
5 ErikaPrepScholar 9 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

### Most Active Experts

1 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

128 posts
2 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

117 posts
3 Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

106 posts
4 Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

94 posts
5 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

92 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts