Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

OG question confusion

Expert replies
by atulmangal » Sat Apr 16, 2011 10:45 pm
It is true that it is against international law to sell plutonium to countries that do not yet have nuclear weapons. But if United States companies do not do so, companies in other countries will.
Which of the following is most like the argument above in its logical structure?
(A) It is true that it is against the police department’s policy to negotiate with kidnappers. But if the police want to prevent loss of life, they must negotiate in some cases.
(B) It is true that it is illegal to refuse to register for military service. But there is a long tradition in the United States of conscientious objection to serving in the armed forces.
(C) It is true that it is illegal for a government official to participate in a transaction in which there is an apparent conflict of interest. But if the facts are examined carefully, it will clearly be seen that there was no actual conflict of interest in the defendant’s case.
(D) It is true that it is against the law to burglarize people’s homes. But someone else certainly would have burglarized that house if the defendant had not done so first.
(E) It is true that company policy forbids supervisors to fire employees without two written warnings. But there have been many supervisors who have disobeyed this policy.

[spoiler]How to select b/w D and E[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by HSPA » Sun Apr 17, 2011 12:12 am
Some companies/countries go against international nuke law. USA is doing this
A) negotiate with law breakers
B) refuse the law. this refusal is happenign from long time
c) No law break at all.
d) Half good.. who is defendent
e) firing emp is against comp law,many bosses go aganist the law.

Why is B not correct? B/E but B > E for me.
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Join the discussion

by rohu27 » Sun Apr 17, 2011 2:08 am
If X will not do not Y, Z will do it.
only option D follows this logic IMO.
Join the discussion

by champmag » Sun Apr 17, 2011 11:45 pm
This is a parallel resoning type of question. The structure of the argument given in the question is
:

P: It is true that it is against international law to sell plutonium to countries that do not yet have nuclear weapons ( statement taken as truth).

P: But if United States companies do not do so

c: companies in other countries will

The last sentence follows the causal relationship If not X then Y.

E is the wrong answer choice because it does not match with the structute of the argument given.

The structure of answer choice E is:

P:It is true that company policy forbids supervisors to fire employees without two written warnings.
(statement taken as truth)

c: there have been many supervisors who have disobeyed this policy.

There is no If not X then Y structure here.

D satisfies the structural requirement perfectly.
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:21 am
champmag wrote:This is a parallel resoning type of question. The structure of the argument given in the question is
:

P: It is true that it is against international law to sell plutonium to countries that do not yet have nuclear weapons ( statement taken as truth).

P: But if United States companies do not do so

c: companies in other countries will

The last sentence follows the causal relationship If not X then Y.

E is the wrong answer choice because it does not match with the structute of the argument given.

The structure of answer choice E is:

P:It is true that company policy forbids supervisors to fire employees without two written warnings.
(statement taken as truth)

c: there have been many supervisors who have disobeyed this policy.

There is no If not X then Y structure here.

D satisfies the structural requirement perfectly.
Good work Megha,

I got the your point and the feel of the question..Thanks
Join the discussion