Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

OG Quant PS Question Answer Explanation

Expert replies
by kourousafama » Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:14 am
Hi,

Does anybody have a clear and simple answer for the following problem? The answer given is the OG quant review seems to me very complicated.

Many thanks,

When positive integer n is divided by 5, the remainder is 1. When n is divided by 7, the remainder is 3. What is the smallest positive integer k such that k+n is a multiple of 35?

a) 3
b) 4
c) 12
d) 32
e) 35
kourousafama
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by kmittal82 » Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:49 am
There are 2 ways of doing this:

1) Hard way (Using algebra)

n= 5p + 1
n= 7q + 3

n+k = 5p + (1+k)
n+k = 7q + (3+k)

if k = 4
n+4 = 5p + 5 = 5(p+1)
n+4 = 7q + 7 = 7(q+1)

Thus, 4 is the smallest number which gives us no remainder for each case, since any number divisible by 35 must be divisible by both 7 and 5.

2) Easy way (picking numbers)

31 is a good number which satisfies this criteria, and you can see adding 4 to 31 will make it divisible by 35

Hence, (B)
Join the discussion

by brijesh » Mon Sep 06, 2010 2:52 am
When positive integer n is divided by 5, the remainder is 1. When n is divided by 7, the remainder is 3. What is the smallest positive integer k such that k+n is a multiple of 35?

a) 3
b) 4
c) 12
d) 32
e) 35[/quote]

I tried as follows:

K+n may be one of the 35, 70, 105, 140....etc

last digit of n may be = 1 or 6

here the k+n= 105 satisfying the above condition , considering the k=4 (smallest +ve integer)

ans: B
Join the discussion

by scorpionz » Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:00 am
kourousafama wrote:Hi,

Does anybody have a clear and simple answer for the following problem? The answer given is the OG quant review seems to me very complicated.

Many thanks,

When positive integer n is divided by 5, the remainder is 1. When n is divided by 7, the remainder is 3. What is the smallest positive integer k such that k+n is a multiple of 35?

a) 3
b) 4
c) 12
d) 32
e) 35
The simplest way in my opinion is as follows -

n = 5p + 1 ==> This means that for n to be exactly divisible by 5, we must add 4 or subtract 1
n = 7q + 3 ==> This means that for n to be exactly divisible by 7, we must add 4 or subtract 3

The question asks us what no. "k" should be added to make the no. k+n divisible by 35. If a no. has to be divisible by 35, clearly it must be divisible by both 5 and 7. Looking at the above two equations for n, it is obvious that the least value that must be added to make the no. divisible by both 5 and 7 is 4. Hence B is the answer.

This method works for me. Hopefully it will work for you too!!

Cheers!
Join the discussion