BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG: Partly as a result of Proposition 13, which severely limits property tax increases

Expert replies
by AbeNeedsAnswers » Thu May 21, 2020 6:48 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Partly as a result of Proposition 13, which severely limits property tax increases, California has come more and more to rely on personal income taxes for its revenues; income taxes have increased from 18 percent of the state’s general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002.

A. have increased from 18 percent of the state’s general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002
B. have increased from 18 percent of the state’s general fund in 1962 to being up to 48 percent by 2002
C. have increased from 18 percent of the state’s general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were up to 48 percent
D. increased from 18 percent of the state’s general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were 48 percent
E. increased from 18 percent of the state’s general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002

E
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

A. have increased from 18 percent of the state’s general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002

whenever we are talking about a specific time (1962 and 2002 in this case), simple past tense (increased) should be used; not present perfect tense (have increased).

B. have increased from 18 percent of the state’s general fund in 1962 to being up to 48 percent by 2002

idiom error

C. have increased from 18 percent of the state’s general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were up to 48 percent
idiom error


D. increased from 18 percent of the state’s general fund in 1962, and by 2002 were 48 percent

idiom error

E. increased from 18 percent of the state’s general fund in 1962 to 48 percent by 2002

The simple past works fine here.
Join the discussion

This question tests our ability of grammatical construction and idioms. From the non-underlined portions, California has already come to rely on personal incomes and statement after semicolon is there to explain so, therefore statement after semicolon should be in tense form to indicate that taxes increase before.

Further as the precise timeline is specified "from 1962 to 2002", we can use simple past tense. Right idiom is From X to Y.

Options A,B & C - can be eliminated on the basis of tense structure

Option D - Incorrect idiom, right form should be from X to Y

Option E - Correct tense structure and correct idiom usage 'from X to Y'
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1