BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG Ed 12 Question 123

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:54 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 8 times
by valleeny » Wed Jan 13, 2010 6:31 am
Question 123 of OG 12 Ed.

Joanna bought only $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps. How many $0.15 stamps did she buy?
(1) She bought $4.40 worth of stamps
(2) She bought an equal number of $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps

OA : A

I read the explanation but didn't particularly like it because the thought process is long and it's very unlikely that I can go through the thought process in 2 minutes.

Anyone has a much shorter solution?

Also, it seems like this question shows that for 2 variables, you don't need two equations to solve?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Data Sufficiency |
User avatar
Community Manager
Posts: 1537
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:10 pmFollowed by: 252 members
Thanked: 653 times

by papgust » Wed Jan 13, 2010 6:55 am
Hi,

Check this post. You could find a detailed explanation here.

https://www.beatthegmat.com/word-transla ... 15309.html
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:20 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 1 times

by Yes.WeCan » Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:31 am
15x + 29y = 440

Y should be modified by 0,5,10 because no other value can result in 440 while keeping x an integer.

440/15 = not an integer
440-145/15 = not an integer

So Y=10 and X=10

I is sufficient. A
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1302
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pmFollowed by: 164 members
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 539 times
GMAT Score:800

by Testluv » Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:38 pm
Also, it seems like this question shows that for 2 variables, you don't need two equations to solve?
You have to be careful about applying this tactic to word problems in data sufficiency. The reason is the nature of many word problems necessitates positive integers. (When we are dealing with objects or people, usually we can't cut up the objects or people into pieces!) :)

This extra restriction (ie, only positive integers) in these kinds of problems often means that only one pair of positive integers will satisfy an equation even if there are two unknowns in the equation.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1