BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG CR:Many athletes inhale pure oxygen after exercise

Expert replies
by NandishSS » Fri Sep 16, 2016 10:48 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Many athletes inhale pure oxygen after exercise in an attempt to increase muscular re-absorption of oxygen. Measured continuously after exercise, however, the blood lactate levels of athletes who inhale pure oxygen are practically identical, on average, to those of athletes who breathe normal air. The lower the blood lactate level is, the higher the muscular re-absorption of oxygen is.

If the statements above are all true, they most strongly support which of the following conclusions?

A) Athletes' muscular re-absorption of oxygen is not increased when they inhale pure oxygen instead of normal air.
B) High blood lactate levels cannot be reduced.
C) Blood lactate levels are a poor measure of oxygen re-absorption by muscles.
D) The amount of oxygen reabsorbed by an athlete's muscles always remains constant.
E) The inhaling of pure oxygen has no legitimate role in athletics.

OA:A

Source:OG 2017
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by NandishSS » Tue Feb 28, 2017 5:53 pm
Bumping the thread for the experts review.
Join the discussion

by crackverbal » Tue Mar 07, 2017 6:27 am
Simplify the argument.

Premise 1 - many athletes inhale pure oxygen after exercise in an attempt to increase re-absorption of oxygen
Premise 2 - blood lactate levels of athletes, measured after exercise, are similar to those of athletes who breathe normal air.
Premise 3 - lower blood lactate level = higher muscular re-absorption of oxygen

Therefore, if blood lactate levels are similar after inhaling pure oxygen, it implies that breathing pure oxygen does not do much to increase muscular re-absorption of oxygen.

Which option states this? Option A.

Option B - Incorrect.
Nowhere is it mentioned that blood lactate levels cannot be reduced.

Option C - Incorrect.
this directly contradicts what is told in the question - "The lower the blood lactate level is, the higher the muscular re-absorption of oxygen is."

Option D - Incorrect.
The argument does not say that amount reabsorbed will always be constant.

Option E - Incorrect.
It might have legitimate benefits other than increasing muscular re-absorption of oxygen.
So, we cannot dismiss it entirely.
Join Free 4 part MBA Through GMAT Video Training Series here -
https://gmat.crackverbal.com/mba-throug ... video-2018

Enroll for our GMAT Trial Course here -
https://gmatonline.crackverbal.com/

For more info on GMAT and MBA, follow us on @AskCrackVerbal
Join the discussion