BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 2nd Ed. CR #40

Expert replies
by tofubeans » Sun May 06, 2012 1:53 pm
Journalist: Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron has long been popular in the state, and he has often talked about running for governor, but he has never run. However, we have just learned that Bergeron has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy by submitting a detailed list of his current financial holdings to the election commission. So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaulating the journalist's argument?

a) Has anybody else who has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for the upcoming election reported greater financial holdings than Bergeron?

b) Is submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election commission's financial disclosure requirements?

c) Did the information recently obtained by the journalist come directly from the election commission?

d) Have Bergerson's financial holdings increased in value in recent years?

e) Had Bergeron also fulfilled the financial disclosure requirements for candidacy before any previous gubernatorial elections?

I picked B but the correct answer is E

Could someone explain why B is wrong? Thanks!
Last edited by tofubeans on Sun May 06, 2012 5:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Sun May 06, 2012 2:31 pm
a) The amount of financial holdings is irrelevant to the disclosure requirements and running for office

b) Does it matter if there are possible ways to fulfill the requirement? Not particularly, and we don't know how it would affect the likelihood of Bergeron running for governor.

c) The source is irrelevant.

d) Change in value is irrelevant.

e) If he has done this before, then we can't conclude that he is likely to run. If he hasn't done this before, then it is safe to say he is likely to run. Either way, we can judge the conclusion.



Questions like these are always tricky. I ask myself what the two possible outcomes are and how they affect the conclusion.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by bubbliiiiiiii » Mon May 07, 2012 3:31 am
tofubeans wrote:J
I picked B but the correct answer is E
As I read the question, I paraphrased the answer which was on similar lines to B and after reading B, I immediately went for it. But, before locking the answer, I re-read the option to find out that this cannot be the answer because, the argument clearly mentions that the candidate has already successfully filed his papers. Option B questions the fulfillment of financial disclosure agreement. Thus, incorrect.

My next choice was option C. But once I read E, I picked it.

C, in my understanding, could be an answer to evaluate the reliability of the source from where journalist has learnt that the candidate has filed his papers.

Whereas, E, in my opinion tries to sneak into the candidate's past and learn from it that whether filing the papers guarantees that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year. If he has already applied in the past and managed either to be or not to be a candidate, then in either cases we cannot guarantee the outcome of the current event.

Hope it helps. :)
Regards,

Pranay
Join the discussion

by Birottam Dutta » Mon May 07, 2012 9:22 am
The answer is definitely E. none of the other answers provide any useful information.
Join the discussion