BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 13 CR 78

Expert replies
by Sauron20 » Tue May 07, 2013 9:08 pm
In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in
automobile accidents,reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in
countries where whiplash is not covered.
Presently,no objectivetest for whiplash exists, so it is true that
spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. Nevertheless,these facts do not warrant the
conclusion drawn by some commentators that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash
injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious.Clearly,in countries where automobile insurance does not
include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that
they actually have suffered.

In the argument given,the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
(A) Thefirst is aclaimthat theargumentdisputes;the second is a conclusionthat has been based on thatclaim.
(B) The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argumentaccepts;the second is
that conclusion.
(C) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion forwhichthe argument provides further
evidence;the secondisthe mainconclusionof theargument.
(D) The first is afinding whoseimplications are at issuein the argument; the secondis a claimpresentedin
orderto argue againstderivingcertainimplications from that finding.
(E) The first is a finding whoseaccuracyis evaluated in the argument;the secondis evidencepresentedto
establishthat the finding is accurate.

Correct Answer : D

My doubt is that both the bold faces say the same thing.
Bold Face 1 says: More cases are reported when insurance is there.
Bold face 2 says : Less cases are reported when insurance is not there.

Why is E not correct?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Lifetron » Tue May 07, 2013 10:11 pm
Why is E not correct?
In this type of questions, you will have two sentences to evaluate in each option.

E :

The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; - The accuracy is not questioned ! They know that the information is accurate but they are not sure about its implication.

the second is evidence presented to establish that the finding is accurate. - Since we know that it is accurate, we don't need anything to prove Statement 1 in E. The 2nd part of E is there to support the unstated conclusion by arguing about the implications of Statement 1 in E

Since, we know that 1st part of E is wrong, we can just eliminate it without even looking at the 2nd part of E !

Hope this helps !
Join the discussion