Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

OG 13 #132

Expert replies
by kheba » Sat Aug 18, 2012 5:36 pm
Joanna bought only $0.15 and $0.29 stamps. How many $0.15 stamps did she buy?

1. She bought $4.40 worth of stamps
2. She bought an equal number of $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps.

OA A

I'd like to see what are the efficient ways of solving it. I took more than 2 minutes for this problem.
Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sat Aug 18, 2012 6:51 pm
Hi!

Normally for this type of question we can rely on our old friend, "number of equations vs number of unknowns". However, there are some cases, such as this one, in which you have more info that you originally thought and you don't actually need as many equations as you may think.

The key to solving this question is noting that stamps are indivisible - in other words, Joanna has to by an integer number of each denomination. Always be on the lookout for objects that are indivisible!

Let's call the two types of stamps c (for cheap) and e (for expensive). From (1), we know that:

15c + 29e = 440

Now, without knowing that c and e have to be integers, we'd quickly say that (1) is insufficient, since we have 2 variables and only 1 equation. However, since c and e have to be integers, it's possible that there's only one pair of values that satisfy the equation. So, we need a quick way to determine if there's one unique solution.

A great way to solve quickly is to pay attention to the units digit of the sum. Since 440 ends in a 0, and since 15c will end in either 5 or 0 every time, 29e must also end in 5 or 0. Focusing on values of e that are multiples of 5 should make the process fairly quick.

e=5... 29e = 145. 440-145=295. Is 295 divisible by 15? NO (since 15 goes into 300)
e=10... 29e = 290. 440-290=150. Is 150 divisible by 15? YES
e=15... 20e = 435. 440-435=5. Is 5 divisible by 15? NO

So the only possible value for e is 10 (which means there's also a unique value for c). (1) is sufficient alone... choose (A)!

(I skipped over looking at (2) - we can pick any equal values for c and e to make (2) true.)
kheba wrote:Joanna bought only $0.15 and $0.29 stamps. How many $0.15 stamps did she buy?

1. She bought $4.40 worth of stamps
2. She bought an equal number of $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps.

OA A

I'd like to see what are the efficient ways of solving it. I took more than 2 minutes for this problem.
Thanks
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:09 am
This question illustrates a common trap on the GMAT.

In high school we learned that, if we're given 1 equation with 2 variables, we cannot find the value of either variable. However, if we restrict the variables to positive integers within a certain range of values, then there are times when we can find the value of a variable if we're given 1 equation with 2 variables.

This common GMAT trap (along with other common traps) is addressed in the following free videos:
https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... cy?id=1105
https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... cy?id=1106
https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... cy?id=1107

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by SmartAssJun » Wed Aug 22, 2012 9:02 pm
Stuart Kovinsky wrote:Hi!

Normally for this type of question we can rely on our old friend, "number of equations vs number of unknowns". However, there are some cases, such as this one, in which you have more info that you originally thought and you don't actually need as many equations as you may think.

The key to solving this question is noting that stamps are indivisible - in other words, Joanna has to by an integer number of each denomination. Always be on the lookout for objects that are indivisible!

Let's call the two types of stamps c (for cheap) and e (for expensive). From (1), we know that:

15c + 29e = 440

Now, without knowing that c and e have to be integers, we'd quickly say that (1) is insufficient, since we have 2 variables and only 1 equation. However, since c and e have to be integers, it's possible that there's only one pair of values that satisfy the equation. So, we need a quick way to determine if there's one unique solution.

A great way to solve quickly is to pay attention to the units digit of the sum. Since 440 ends in a 0, and since 15c will end in either 5 or 0 every time, 29e must also end in 5 or 0. Focusing on values of e that are multiples of 5 should make the process fairly quick.

e=5... 29e = 145. 440-145=295. Is 295 divisible by 15? NO (since 15 goes into 300)
e=10... 29e = 290. 440-290=150. Is 150 divisible by 15? YES
e=15... 20e = 435. 440-435=5. Is 5 divisible by 15? NO

So the only possible value for e is 10 (which means there's also a unique value for c). (1) is sufficient alone... choose (A)!

(I skipped over looking at (2) - we can pick any equal values for c and e to make (2) true.)
kheba wrote:Joanna bought only $0.15 and $0.29 stamps. How many $0.15 stamps did she buy?

1. She bought $4.40 worth of stamps
2. She bought an equal number of $0.15 stamps and $0.29 stamps.

OA A

I'd like to see what are the efficient ways of solving it. I took more than 2 minutes for this problem.
Thanks
Same way I did it!
Join the discussion