BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 12th edition Q # 38

Expert replies
by bhumika.k.shah » Fri Feb 05, 2010 3:09 am
38. If p1 and p2 are the populations and r1 and r2 are the
numbers of representatives of District 1 and District 2,
respectively, the ratio of the population to the number
of representatives is greater for which of the two
districts?

(1) p1 > p2
(2) r2 > r1

Can someone try explaining via a different approach. the one explained in OG is tooo confusing
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by raisethebar » Fri Feb 05, 2010 3:38 am
Is the Ans C. Both statements are required to answer.
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Fri Feb 05, 2010 3:40 am
Yes . But what made u say that ?
raisethebar wrote:Is the Ans C. Both statements are required to answer.
Join the discussion

by raisethebar » Fri Feb 05, 2010 4:24 am
bhumika.k.shah wrote:Yes . But what made u say that ?
raisethebar wrote:Is the Ans C. Both statements are required to answer.

(1) p1 > p2 -insuff.
(2) r2 > r1 -insuff

but statement 1 says p1 is more and statement 2 says r1 is less

we are interested in finding the ratio p1/r1 and p2/r2

so
greater number(respective to p1/p2) / smaller number(respective to r1,r2) > lesser number(respective to p1/p2) /larger number(respective to r1,r2)

p1/r1 > p2/r2

Let me know if you dont understand this, I will try to explain in other way.
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Fri Feb 05, 2010 4:29 am
I got it !
but is there another approach than this?
like plugging #s or blah!

???
raisethebar wrote:
bhumika.k.shah wrote:Yes . But what made u say that ?
raisethebar wrote:Is the Ans C. Both statements are required to answer.

(1) p1 > p2 -insuff.
(2) r2 > r1 -insuff

but statement 1 says p1 is more and statement 2 says r1 is less

we are interested in finding the ratio p1/r1 and p2/r2

so
greater number(respective to p1/p2) / smaller number(respective to r1,r2) > lesser number(respective to p1/p2) /larger number(respective to r1,r2)

p1/r1 > p2/r2

Let me know if you dont understand this, I will try to explain in other way.
Join the discussion

by ajith » Fri Feb 05, 2010 4:49 am
bhumika.k.shah wrote:38. If p1 and p2 are the populations and r1 and r2 are the
numbers of representatives of District 1 and District 2,
respectively, the ratio of the population to the number
of representatives is greater for which of the two
districts?

(1) p1 > p2
(2) r2 > r1

Can someone try explaining via a different approach. the one explained in OG is tooo confusing
Say 1000 is the population for District 1 and 2000 is the population for District 2

Say A has 10 representatives and B has 15 representatives

Ratio for D1 = 10/1000 = 1/100 = 4/400
Ratio for D2 = 15/2000 = 3/400

now Say B has 40 reps

Ratio for D1 = 1/100
Ratio for D2 = 40/2000 =2/100

Both of these satisfy conditions 1 and 2 and gives contradicting results
hence E
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by sanju09 » Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:01 am
bhumika.k.shah wrote:38. If p1 and p2 are the populations and r1 and r2 are the
numbers of representatives of District 1 and District 2,
respectively, the ratio of the population to the number
of representatives is greater for which of the two
districts?

(1) p1 > p2
(2) r2 > r1

Can someone try explaining via a different approach. the one explained in OG is tooo confusing
Take the two statements together...

(1) If p1 > p2, then p1/p2 > 1.

(2) If r2 > r1, then r1/r2 < 1.

Hence, p1/p2 > r1/r2

or p1/r1 > p2/r2. DONE

[spoiler]C[/spoiler]
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha



Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001

www.manyagroup.com
Join the discussion

by ajith » Fri Feb 05, 2010 6:11 am
sanju09 wrote:
bhumika.k.shah wrote:38. If p1 and p2 are the populations and r1 and r2 are the
numbers of representatives of District 1 and District 2,
respectively, the ratio of the population to the number
of representatives is greater for which of the two
districts?

(1) p1 > p2
(2) r2 > r1

Can someone try explaining via a different approach. the one explained in OG is tooo confusing
Take the two statements together...

(1) If p1 > p2, then p1/p2 > 1.

(2) If r2 > r1, then r1/r2 < 1.

Hence, p1/p2 > r1/r2

or p1/r1 > p2/r2. DONE

[spoiler]C[/spoiler]
My Mistake!!!! Ignore my post the values I assumed do not follow the conditions
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion