BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 12th edition - Q # 18.

Expert replies
by bhumika.k.shah » Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:46 am
Plants are more effi cient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.

(A) Plants are more effi cient at acquiring carbon than are fungi,

(B) Plants are more effi cient at acquiring carbon than fungi,

(C) Plants are more effi cient than fungi at acquiring carbon,

(D) Plants, more effi cient than fungi at acquiring carbon,

(E) Plants acquire carbon more effi ciently than fungi,

isnt it supposed to be plants are more efficient at acquiring something ! ? i know then its considering fungi as the form of carbon dioxide..
but i just wanted to know that isnt it like

X is more efficient at ____ ?
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by dmitriyaleyev » Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:54 am
IMO C

in the form of carbon dioxide modifies carbon.
in other words >> carbon IN WHICH FORM, >>>> in the form of carbon dioxide.
You can get rid of A B E due to the fact that it is not funqi that are in the form of carbon dioxide.
D - creates a subordinate clause out of main clause and becomes sentence with no point. - wrong.

so
only C left.
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:04 am
i get that
but i am saying isnt it supposed to be X is more efficient at ____ ?
dmitriyaleyev wrote:IMO C

in the form of carbon dioxide modifies carbon.
in other words >> carbon IN WHICH FORM, >>>> in the form of carbon dioxide.
You can get rid of A B E due to the fact that it is not funqi that are in the form of carbon dioxide.
D - creates a subordinate clause out of main clause and becomes sentence with no point. - wrong.

so
only C left.
Join the discussion

by dmitriyaleyev » Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:26 am
no, we compare plants and funqi relative to ONE ability to do something.

(C) Plants are more effi cient than fungi at acquiring carbon,

We put plants and funqi next to each other to show unambiguous comparison.

Does it help?

I think you are trying to compare funqi and carbon.....
Join the discussion

by bhumika.k.shah » Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:19 pm
yes it did help!
thanks!
and no i was trying to compare plants with fungi but wanted to clear the doubt !

thanks!
dmitriyaleyev wrote:no, we compare plants and funqi relative to ONE ability to do something.

(C) Plants are more effi cient than fungi at acquiring carbon,

We put plants and funqi next to each other to show unambiguous comparison.

Does it help?

I think you are trying to compare funqi and carbon.....
Join the discussion

by komal » Wed Feb 10, 2010 12:18 am
Plants are more effi cient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.

This sentence compares how efficiently plants and fungi acquire carbon and convert it into sugars. The sentence construction needs to make clear that plants and fungi are the two topics being compared, and it must also clarify that in the form of carbon dioxide refers to carbon rather than to either plants or fungi.

(C) Correct. The sentence clearly compares plants to fungi, and in the form of carbon dioxide correctly modifies carbon.
Join the discussion

by babuxavier » Sun Dec 30, 2012 1:40 am
IMO C
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1