Faced With an eslimated $2 billion budget gap the city's mayor proposed a nearlv 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.
(a) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(b)proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent In the amount It was allocating to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and for subsidizing
(c)proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(d)has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions, and to subsidize
(e)was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions and for the subsidization
It's not that clear to me why the verbs "maintain"& "subsidize" (answer A) are the ones that must be parallel whereas "reduce"& "subsidize"are not (answer C)
Thanks in advance!
OG 12 Verbal SC
This topic has expert replies
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 9:42 am
- Thanked: 1 times
- GMAT Score:600
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
- Thanked: 45 times
- Followed by:2 members
I would say this is becuase of MEANING.
Structure: X has proposed Y for A and B. A and B are infinitive.
in option C: "amount from previous year" is awkward & "that" modifies amount so it should be next to it.
Structure: X has proposed Y for A and B. A and B are infinitive.
in option C: "amount from previous year" is awkward & "that" modifies amount so it should be next to it.
Fernando diaz wrote:Faced With an eslimated $2 billion budget gap the city's mayor proposed a nearlv 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.
(a) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(b)proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent In the amount It was allocating to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and for subsidizing
(c)proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(d)has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions, and to subsidize
(e)was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions and for the subsidization
It's not that clear to me why the verbs "maintain"& "subsidize" (answer A) are the ones that must be parallel whereas "reduce"& "subsidize"are not (answer C)
Thanks in advance!
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 9:42 am
- Thanked: 1 times
- GMAT Score:600
Yep but for me for to choose A was an assupmption since the grammar errors in C are not that clear to me (. Anyway next time i will be more careful with the "that modifier".sameerballani wrote:I would say this is becuase of MEANING.
Structure: X has proposed Y for A and B. A and B are infinitive.
in option C: "amount from previous year" is awkward & "that" modifies amount so it should be next to it.
Fernando diaz wrote:Faced With an eslimated $2 billion budget gap the city's mayor proposed a nearlv 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.
(a) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(b)proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent In the amount It was allocating to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and for subsidizing
(c)proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(d)has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions, and to subsidize
(e)was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions and for the subsidization
It's not that clear to me why the verbs "maintain"& "subsidize" (answer A) are the ones that must be parallel whereas "reduce"& "subsidize"are not (answer C)
Thanks in advance!
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
- Thanked: 45 times
- Followed by:2 members
Always try and see
1) the modifier is as near as possible to the thing it modifies. NOT NECESSARY but preferred.
2) the modifier unambiguously modifies the part it is to modify. NECESSARY.
Sometimes this may happen that modifier would be placed such that it seems applicable on 2 parts. Then this is ambiguous. Can't think of any example to explain..
I hope i make some sense
Thanks
1) the modifier is as near as possible to the thing it modifies. NOT NECESSARY but preferred.
2) the modifier unambiguously modifies the part it is to modify. NECESSARY.
Sometimes this may happen that modifier would be placed such that it seems applicable on 2 parts. Then this is ambiguous. Can't think of any example to explain..
I hope i make some sense
Thanks
Fernando diaz wrote:Yep but for me for to choose A was an assupmption since the grammar errors in C are not that clear to me (. Anyway next time i will be more careful with the "that modifier".sameerballani wrote:I would say this is becuase of MEANING.
Structure: X has proposed Y for A and B. A and B are infinitive.
in option C: "amount from previous year" is awkward & "that" modifies amount so it should be next to it.
Fernando diaz wrote:Faced With an eslimated $2 billion budget gap the city's mayor proposed a nearlv 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.
(a) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(b)proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent In the amount It was allocating to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and for subsidizing
(c)proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(d)has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions, and to subsidize
(e)was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions and for the subsidization
It's not that clear to me why the verbs "maintain"& "subsidize" (answer A) are the ones that must be parallel whereas "reduce"& "subsidize"are not (answer C)
Thanks in advance!
Last edited by sameerballani on Fri Jul 01, 2011 7:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
In C, we don't want to subsidize to be parallel with to reduce because then the meaning of the sentence could change:Fernando diaz wrote:Faced With an eslimated $2 billion budget gap the city's mayor proposed a nearlv 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.
(a) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(b)proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent In the amount It was allocating to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and for subsidizing
(c)proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(d)has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions, and to subsidize
(e)was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions and for the subsidization
It's not that clear to me why the verbs "maintain"& "subsidize" (answer A) are the ones that must be parallel whereas "reduce"& "subsidize"are not (answer C)
Thanks in advance!
...the city's mayor proposed to reduce...the amount...and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.
The parallelism above could suggest that the mayor proposed to SUBSIDIZE the arts groups. The intended meaning of the sentence is that the mayor proposed a REDUCTION in the amount given to the arts groups.
Since C could change the meaning, eliminate C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 9:42 am
- Thanked: 1 times
- GMAT Score:600
Got it Mitch, since "we don´t want to change the original meaning excepting when it is strictily necessary".GMATGuruNY wrote:In C, we don't want to subsidize to be parallel with to reduce because then the meaning of the sentence could change:Fernando diaz wrote:Faced With an eslimated $2 billion budget gap the city's mayor proposed a nearlv 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.
(a) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(b)proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent In the amount It was allocating to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and for subsidizing
(c)proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(d)has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions, and to subsidize
(e)was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions and for the subsidization
It's not that clear to me why the verbs "maintain"& "subsidize" (answer A) are the ones that must be parallel whereas "reduce"& "subsidize"are not (answer C)
Thanks in advance!
...the city's mayor proposed to reduce...the amount...and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.
The parallelism above could suggest that the mayor proposed to SUBSIDIZE the arts groups. The intended meaning of the sentence is that the mayor proposed a REDUCTION in the amount given to the arts groups.
Since C could change the meaning, eliminate C.
Thanks a lot!!
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 9:42 am
- Thanked: 1 times
- GMAT Score:600
Nope didn´t get you .. but it sounds like a good advice though.sameerballani wrote:Always try and see
1) the modifier is as possible to the thing it modifies. NOT NECESSARY but preferred.
2) the modifier unambiguously modifies the part it is to modify. NECESSARY.
Sometimes this may happen that modifier would be placed such that it seems applicable on 2 parts. Then this is ambiguous. Can't think of any example to explain..
I hope i make some sense
Thanks
Fernando diaz wrote:Yep but for me for to choose A was an assupmption since the grammar errors in C are not that clear to me (. Anyway next time i will be more careful with the "that modifier".sameerballani wrote:I would say this is becuase of MEANING.
Structure: X has proposed Y for A and B. A and B are infinitive.
in option C: "amount from previous year" is awkward & "that" modifies amount so it should be next to it.
Fernando diaz wrote:Faced With an eslimated $2 billion budget gap the city's mayor proposed a nearlv 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.
(a) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(b)proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent In the amount It was allocating to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and for subsidizing
(c)proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(d)has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions, and to subsidize
(e)was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions and for the subsidization
It's not that clear to me why the verbs "maintain"& "subsidize" (answer A) are the ones that must be parallel whereas "reduce"& "subsidize"are not (answer C)
Thanks in advance!
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
- Thanked: 45 times
- Followed by:2 members
modified the original post.
I missed the word NEAR.
I missed the word NEAR.
Fernando diaz wrote:Nope didn´t get you .. but it sounds like a good advice though.sameerballani wrote:Always try and see
1) the modifier is as possible to the thing it modifies. NOT NECESSARY but preferred.
2) the modifier unambiguously modifies the part it is to modify. NECESSARY.
Sometimes this may happen that modifier would be placed such that it seems applicable on 2 parts. Then this is ambiguous. Can't think of any example to explain..
I hope i make some sense
Thanks
Fernando diaz wrote:Yep but for me for to choose A was an assupmption since the grammar errors in C are not that clear to me (. Anyway next time i will be more careful with the "that modifier".sameerballani wrote:I would say this is becuase of MEANING.
Structure: X has proposed Y for A and B. A and B are infinitive.
in option C: "amount from previous year" is awkward & "that" modifies amount so it should be next to it.
Fernando diaz wrote:Faced With an eslimated $2 billion budget gap the city's mayor proposed a nearlv 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.
(a) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(b)proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent In the amount It was allocating to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and for subsidizing
(c)proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(d)has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions, and to subsidize
(e)was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions and for the subsidization
It's not that clear to me why the verbs "maintain"& "subsidize" (answer A) are the ones that must be parallel whereas "reduce"& "subsidize"are not (answer C)
Thanks in advance!