BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG-12, Q-114

Expert replies
by niketdoshi123 » Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:50 am
Guidebook writer : I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument?

a) The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original
carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.
b) Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
c) The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in
quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
d) The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to
fall into disuse and be demolished.
e) The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Ashujain » Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:36 am
niketdoshi123 wrote:Guidebook writer : I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument?

a) The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original
carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.
b) Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
c) The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in
quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
d) The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to
fall into disuse and be demolished.
e) The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
A) Does not say anything about the time period and hence irrelevant
B) Out of scope
C) Strengthen
D) Weakens because it clearly implies that only those hotels (built before 1930) are still in use which have a good quality of carpentry. So the guidebook writer can not generalize it by concluding that "carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently".
E) Strengthens
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:52 am
niketdoshi123 wrote:Guidebook writer : I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument?

a) The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original
carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.
b) Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.
c) The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in
quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.
d) The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to
fall into disuse and be demolished.
e) The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
This argument exhibits a CHANGE IN SCOPE.
The premise is about a very limited SAMPLING: the hotels that the guidebook writer HAS VISITED.
The conclusion is about the WHOLE: ALL hotels built before 1930.

To weaken the conclusion, the correct answer choice likely will show that the SAMPLING -- the hotels that the writer HAS VISITED -- is NOT representative of the WHOLE.

Answer choice D: The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished..
The implication is that the hotels that were POORLY constructed have likely been DEMOLISHED.
Clearly, the guidebook writer could not have visited these hotels.
Thus, the SAMPLING (the hotels that the writer HAS VISITED) is not representative of the WHOLE (ALL hotels built before 1930).

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion