BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 11th edition Q 154- Have I oversimplified the problem?

Expert replies
by Nidhs » Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:44 pm
In the following question, can someone please tell me if my reasoning is correct or if i have oversimplified the problem;

Is x negative?
(1) x^3(1-x^2)<0
(2) x^2-1<0

My answer is also c, as given the book...but my reasoning to it is the following;
acc to me st1 says- x^3<0 or (1-x^2)<0,
either x^3<0 could be true or (1-x^2)<0 could be true but not both as the value needs to be negative. As we don't know which one is true INSUFFICIENT

St2 x^2-1<0 but we don't know if x is positive or negative; so INSUFFICIENT

Combining 1 and 2 says that (1-x^2)is not less than 0. Hence, x^3<0 must be correct.

Do I have the right approach for solving this?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by gabriel » Sat Jan 19, 2008 3:29 am
Seems right .. this is how I would have solved it

Regards
Join the discussion

by smar83 » Mon Jan 21, 2008 9:01 am
Nidhs,

Just an off topic question...

Which quant books are you referring to ? PR or Kaplan apart from OG.. ?

Which one sounds better to you ? I have PR math, planning to take Kaplan..

Appreciate your reply,

Thanks.
Join the discussion

by mollyrg » Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:24 am
Hi Smar83,

I think Kaplan will be good along with OG. PR is good to start off. But the level of maths is very easy.

Molly
Join the discussion

by smar83 » Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:35 am
mollyrg,


Thank you. Yes, I have exhausted PR.Planning to move over to kaplan pretty soon.

Thanks again.
Join the discussion

og 154 ds

by resilient » Sat Feb 09, 2008 6:28 pm
After througuhly testing numbers I do not understand how to even combine these to equations together. I do know that both 1 and 2 alone are insufficient but cant grasp the idea of them both together being sufficient. Help
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion

picking numbers

by resilient » Sat Feb 09, 2008 6:50 pm
by the way....the numbers I chose were..

statement 1. x=-2,-3

statement2. x= 1/2,-1/2
Appetite for 700 and I scraped my plate!
Join the discussion

Nidhs wrote:In the following question, can someone please tell me if my reasoning is correct or if i have oversimplified the problem;

Is x negative?
(1) x^3(1-x^2)<0
(2) x^2-1<0

My answer is also c, as given the book...but my reasoning to it is the following;
acc to me st1 says- x^3<0 or (1-x^2)<0,
either x^3<0 could be true or (1-x^2)<0 could be true but not both as the value needs to be negative. As we don't know which one is true INSUFFICIENT

St2 x^2-1<0 but we don't know if x is positive or negative; so INSUFFICIENT

Combining 1 and 2 says that (1-x^2)is not less than 0. Hence, x^3<0 must be correct.

Do I have the right approach for solving this?
Yeah I had the same issue, I split (1) x^3(1-x^2)<0 as X^3, (1-x), (1+x) though... that way it's either x<0 or x >0 and (1-x) <0 which is possible.

The method in the book is very lengthy and hopefully unnecessary?
Join the discussion

Nidhs wrote:In the following question, can someone please tell me if my reasoning is correct or if i have oversimplified the problem;

Is x negative?
(1) x^3(1-x^2)<0
(2) x^2-1<0

from one

the expression can be -ve if:

a) x is -ve given that /x/< 1 or
b) x +ve and /x/>1...........insuff

from 2

x^2 < 1 x can be +ve or -ve fraction. or 0........insuff

both

x is not 0 , /x/<1 and thus option (a) from one is valid...C
Join the discussion

og ds 154

by simba12123 » Fri Oct 24, 2008 9:16 am
I like the approach to this question. However, I am wondering how to combine these two statments. BOth statements yield positive and negative fractions. THerefore isnt it correct to say that the answer is E? IN order for c to be correct there must be common ground or agreement of shared values. I cant rationalize how this is c! please help clear this matter!
Join the discussion