BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

og-11-rev-sc70

Expert replies
by paes » Wed Sep 08, 2010 9:41 am
Faced with an estimated $2 billion budget gap, the city's mayor proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize hundreds of local arts groups.

(A) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(B) proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent in the amount it was allocating to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and for subsidizing
(C) proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent, the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(D) has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions, and to subsidize
(E) was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions and for the subsidization

[spoiler]Source : OG11-Review
OA later[/spoiler]
Last edited by paes on Wed Sep 08, 2010 9:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Gurpinder » Wed Sep 08, 2010 9:45 am
is the "the city's mayor " supposed to be bolded?
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
Join the discussion

by paes » Wed Sep 08, 2010 9:55 am
Gurpinder wrote:is the "the city's mayor " supposed to be bolded?
thanks, corrected it.
Join the discussion

by selango » Wed Sep 08, 2010 9:57 am
A is correct..

Parallelism is maintained in A."to maintain" and "to subsidize"
--Anand--
Join the discussion

by Gurpinder » Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:02 am
IMO (A). Whats oA?

(A) proposed a nearly 17 percent reduction in the amount allocated the previous year to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(B) proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent in the amount it was allocating to maintain the city's major cultural institutions and for subsidizing
(C) proposed to reduce, by nearly 17 percent, the amount from the previous year that was allocated for the maintenance of the city's major cultural institutions and to subsidize
(D) has proposed a reduction from the previous year of nearly 17 percent of the amount it was allocating for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions, and to subsidize
(E) was proposing that the amount they were allocating be reduced by nearly 17 percent from the previous year for maintaining the city's major cultural institutions and for the subsidization
"Do not confuse motion and progress. A rocking horse keeps moving but does not make any progress."
- Alfred A. Montapert, Philosopher.
Join the discussion

by paes » Wed Sep 08, 2010 6:26 pm
OA is A.

My confusion is that 'propose to' is the correct Idiom.
So I selected C straight away without realizing the parallelism issue.

Can you guys put some thought on it.
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Wed Sep 08, 2010 8:22 pm
This question was categorized as "parallelism" question and not idiom, so I think the most important element should be parallelism.
Yep.
Join the discussion

by paes » Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:12 pm
uwhusky wrote:This question was categorized as "parallelism" question and not idiom, so I think the most important element should be parallelism.
You can't say that it is a parallelism question so ignore the Idiom.
IDIOMS are equally or more important than parallelism.
If you find a wrong idiom in a sentence, then probably you will not go to check the parallelism there.
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:20 pm
What exactly is your question here? Are you challenging the OA? I said nothing of picking an answer that demonstrates parallelism but ignores idiom.

There are a lot of sentence structures that have idioms but are not tested, but it doesn't mean you should ignore them. I thought I was directly answering your question, which is that this question is testing the usage of parallelism and not idiom. The correct answer does not have incorrect idiom; it just doesn't use the same idiom as C.
Yep.
Join the discussion

by paes » Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:53 pm
uwhusky@

Thanks to address the question.

But probably you didn't get my question correctly.

I am not seeing the right usage of Idiom in A.

A is like : I propose a 17% reduction in the budget for this year < to subsidize the cutural event >.
C is like : I propose to reduce the budget by 17% for this year < to subsidize the cutural event >.

Please explain whether A is using the right Idiom and how.
Join the discussion

by uwhusky » Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:58 pm
I see what your question is.

Both forms are actually correct because "propose" could be either transitive or intransitive:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictiona ... 1284015415

So they're both idiomatically correct, thus idiom is apparently not being tested here.

Additionally, here are some other OG questions that use the same form:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/question-rega ... 70235.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/kidnly-expli ... 42014.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/erosion-of-e ... 38928.html

They are all actual OG/Verbal Guide questions, but they're listed under SC1000. If you want to know their corresponding OG/VG guide question numbers, let me know.
Yep.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1