BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG 11, DS Q91

Expert replies
by skhalilov » Sat Jun 02, 2007 3:53 am
I will post the question and explanation from the book as it is and then ask the question. Here it goes:

By what percent did the median household income in Country Y decrease from 1970 to 1980?

(1) In 1970 the median household income in country Y was 2/3 of the median household income in Country X

(2) In 1980 the median household income in Country Y was 1/2 of the median household income in Country X.

The books lists answer E and gives this explanation:

In order to answer this question, it is neceassary to have the data on the median household income in Country Y for both 1970 and 1980.

(1) This offers no information about the actual income in Country X, so the 1970 data for Country Y cannot be determined, and there are no data for Country Y for 1980; NOT sufficient.

(2) This provides no facts about the income of Country X in 1980, and there are no data for Country Y for 1970; NOT sufficient.

Both (1) and (2) together compare the median household income of Country Y to that of Country X for the pertinent dates. However, without any concrete data about Country X, the comparisons are not helpful in calculating the percent decrease in Country Y from 1970 to 1980.

The correct answer is E.

Wouldn't the answer be C? Please check my thinking and comment:

Statement (1) suggests that Y = 66.6X and statement (2) suggests that Y = 0.5X.

Thus, could we say that 66.6X - 0.5X would give us 0.04, which would stand for the percent decrease? :?

Comments appreciated!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by drhomler » Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:12 pm
The way I think about this question:
It cant be C because you would be comparing country X relative to country Y for the two time periods if you used some variable to denote country Y in 1970 you would need an additional variable to represent Country Y in 1980 and then find country x relative to each date to find the change in X. Since we cannot assume that Y remained constant from 1970 to 1980 we only know x relative to Y which cannot answer the question so the answer is E.

Hope that makes sense. Perhaps Jay can enlighten us.
Join the discussion

by drhomler » Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:13 pm
Sorry I flipped the X's and Y's in my explanation but the reasoning is still the same.
Join the discussion