Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

OG 11, DS Q91

Expert replies
by skhalilov » Sat Jun 02, 2007 3:53 am
I will post the question and explanation from the book as it is and then ask the question. Here it goes:

By what percent did the median household income in Country Y decrease from 1970 to 1980?

(1) In 1970 the median household income in country Y was 2/3 of the median household income in Country X

(2) In 1980 the median household income in Country Y was 1/2 of the median household income in Country X.

The books lists answer E and gives this explanation:

In order to answer this question, it is neceassary to have the data on the median household income in Country Y for both 1970 and 1980.

(1) This offers no information about the actual income in Country X, so the 1970 data for Country Y cannot be determined, and there are no data for Country Y for 1980; NOT sufficient.

(2) This provides no facts about the income of Country X in 1980, and there are no data for Country Y for 1970; NOT sufficient.

Both (1) and (2) together compare the median household income of Country Y to that of Country X for the pertinent dates. However, without any concrete data about Country X, the comparisons are not helpful in calculating the percent decrease in Country Y from 1970 to 1980.

The correct answer is E.

Wouldn't the answer be C? Please check my thinking and comment:

Statement (1) suggests that Y = 66.6X and statement (2) suggests that Y = 0.5X.

Thus, could we say that 66.6X - 0.5X would give us 0.04, which would stand for the percent decrease? :?

Comments appreciated!
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by drhomler » Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:12 pm
The way I think about this question:
It cant be C because you would be comparing country X relative to country Y for the two time periods if you used some variable to denote country Y in 1970 you would need an additional variable to represent Country Y in 1980 and then find country x relative to each date to find the change in X. Since we cannot assume that Y remained constant from 1970 to 1980 we only know x relative to Y which cannot answer the question so the answer is E.

Hope that makes sense. Perhaps Jay can enlighten us.
Join the discussion

by drhomler » Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:13 pm
Sorry I flipped the X's and Y's in my explanation but the reasoning is still the same.
Join the discussion