Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

OG 11 - CR - Q81

Expert replies
by Poornima » Mon May 26, 2008 5:29 pm
A recent report determined that although only 3 percent of drivers on Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, 33 percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not.

The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?

A)
B)Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.
C)
D)Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were ticketed more than once in the time period covered by the report
E)

I am unable to choose between B and D. The answer is B but I am not convinced. Can someone please help?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by nil4700 » Mon May 26, 2008 6:58 pm
The word REGULARLY holds the key here. In option D, it is said that many of the vehicles that were ticketed were ticketed more than once. But this is out of the information given in the passage. There is no mentioning of how many times the vehicles have been counted. On this reason you can rule this out. In option B, it is clearly said that once ticketed the drivers tend to get ticketed again and again.... the word REGULARLY holds the key again.
Join the discussion

by ksh » Tue May 27, 2008 4:06 am
Hi poornima,

choice D is rather strong in stating so, moderate is choice B. concentrate on the stimulus that states " drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly "

So, the best choice is B.
Join the discussion

by Poornima » Mon Jun 16, 2008 5:56 pm
Thank you!! I got it now!
Join the discussion

by perfectstranger » Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:53 am
Can anyone explain the logic in this question?
Join the discussion

by iwill » Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:05 pm
PerfectStranger,

Try to negate choice B.
If Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are not likely to exceed the speed again, the count of vehicles got ticketed wont be as high as 33%.
Join the discussion

by sachindia » Wed Aug 29, 2012 5:54 pm
Hi ,

I understand B is right.
But here, if we try to apply negation on B, it probably doesn't work or becomes too abstract to understand and check if the conclusion falls apart.

So the takeaway should be that, we shouldn't always apply negation?
Regards,
Sach
Join the discussion

by ankit0411 » Wed Aug 29, 2012 8:03 pm
Poornima wrote:A recent report determined that although only 3 percent of drivers on Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, 33 percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not.

The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?

A)
B)Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.
C)
D)Many of the vehicles that were ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were ticketed more than once in the time period covered by the report
E)

I am unable to choose between B and D. The answer is B but I am not convinced. Can someone please help?
Stem talks about the following: 3% of drivers equipped with radar, and 33% of all drivers who were ticketed for exceeding speed were with radar.

Conclusion : drivers who equip their vehicles with radars are more likely to exceed the speed limit than those who are not equipped:

Now option B :

Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who are not ticketed.

It clearly links the conclusion with the premise.
Don't predict future , create it !
Join the discussion

by sachindia » Wed Aug 29, 2012 8:57 pm
What you are saying is truE ankit,
but my doubt is


if we try to apply negation on B, it probably doesn't work or becomes too abstract to understand and check if the conclusion falls apart.

So the takeaway should be that, we shouldn't always apply negation?
Regards,
Sach
Join the discussion

by ankit0411 » Wed Aug 29, 2012 10:35 pm
sachindia wrote:What you are saying is truE ankit,
but my doubt is


if we try to apply negation on B, it probably doesn't work or becomes too abstract to understand and check if the conclusion falls apart.

So the takeaway should be that, we shouldn't always apply negation?
Always applying is a little to extreme. Check sensibly for the options where Negation technique can be applied.

I always don't apply the negation technique but when I'm stuck down to 2 options I generally use this rule.
Don't predict future , create it !
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Aug 31, 2012 6:15 am
sachindia wrote:What you are saying is truE ankit,
but my doubt is


if we try to apply negation on B, it probably doesn't work or becomes too abstract to understand and check if the conclusion falls apart.

So the takeaway should be that, we shouldn't always apply negation?
To see how the negation test can be applied to the OA, check my post here:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/driver-who-e ... 16633.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion