BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

OG-11. 1st edition (Purple) 107

Expert replies
by rishijhawar » Mon Jun 27, 2011 4:08 am
The physical structure of the human eye enables it to sense light of wavelengths up to 0.0005 millimeters: infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength-0.1 millimeters--is too long to be registered by the eye.
(A) infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelengths0.1 millimeters-is too long to be registered by the eye
(B) however, the wavelength of infrared radiation-0.1 millimeters-is too long to be registered by the eye making it invisible
(C) infrared radiation however is invisible because its wavelength-0.1 millimeters-is too long for the eye to register it
(D) however because the wavelength of infrared radiation is 0.1 millimeters it is too long for the eye to register and thus invisible
(E) however infrared radiation has a wavelength of 0.1 millimeters that is too long for the eye to register, thus making it invisible

[spoiler]Please explain why not C instead of OA (A)
[/spoiler]
Last edited by rishijhawar on Mon Jul 04, 2011 9:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by deep.amangmat » Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:38 am
Hi rishi, please make sure you post correct question. I spent almost 5 minutes thinking how choice A is correct. And then I picked up my OG and realized that you basically missed a "semicolon" before infrared radiation. Please correct the question in your post.

I think in Choice C, "it" is incorrect. But I am not too certain about it.

Definitely need help with this one...
Join the discussion

by deep.amangmat » Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:21 pm
Any help on this one?
Join the discussion

by rishijhawar » Mon Jul 04, 2011 9:57 pm
Hi, appreciate if we can have an expert opinion. thx
Join the discussion

by Frankenstein » Mon Jul 04, 2011 10:17 pm
Hi,
I think the usage of 'it' is problematic in C. Does 'it' refer to infrared radiation or wavelength?
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise
Join the discussion

by deep.amangmat » Wed Jul 06, 2011 12:15 pm
Yes I agree that "it" is problematic.

Thanks :)
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1