BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Og 10 is wrong

Expert replies
by magnus opus » Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:23 am
53. There is no consensus on what role. if any, is played by acid rain in slowing the growth or damaging forests
in the eastern United States.
(A) slowing the growth or damaging
(B) the damage or the slowing of the growth of
(C) the damage to or the slowness of the growth of
(D) damaged or slowed growth of
(E) damaging or slowing the growth of

The correct answer is E.

however, since damaging and slowing are linked by "or" either verb can take the sentence that follows.
so, if the sentence is broken it can be read as:-

There is no consensus on what role. if any, is played by acid rain in damaging the growth of forests
in the eastern United States.

which is clearly illogical as growth is not tangible so it cant be damaged-though it can be hampered but thats not relevant here.

Hence the sentence is clearly ambiguous.

C on the other hand changes the intent slightly but is grammatically perfect.

If you have a logical explanation of why E is correct. please share.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by selango » Tue Sep 14, 2010 7:46 am
Option E is correct.

The sentence can be rephrased as,

what role is played by acid rain in damaging forests
what role is played by acid rain in slowing the growth of forests

Here parallelism is maintained properly and preposition "of" is needed.
--Anand--
Join the discussion

by niksworth » Tue Sep 14, 2010 9:40 am
Selango's explanation is perfect. You spotted the wrong elements for parallelism.

And be careful while declaring that any OG answer is wrong. Not the easiest of tasks.
scio me nihil scire
Join the discussion

by magnus opus » Wed Sep 15, 2010 12:58 am
I agree with you on how you have shown parallel elements.

however, doesnt the other illogical parallelism also exist?

In my opinon its thus results in ambiguity
Join the discussion

by magnus opus » Wed Sep 15, 2010 1:01 am
selango wrote:Option E is correct.

The sentence can be rephrased as,

what role is played by acid rain in damaging forests
what role is played by acid rain in slowing the growth of forests

Here parallelism is maintained properly and preposition "of" is needed.
I am not denying that this is possibility, However the other parallel explanation can also exist so it makes it unclear for the reader.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1