BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Of the two proposals for solving the traffic problems

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Sun Jun 17, 2018 12:12 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Of the two proposals for solving the traffic problems on Main Street, Chen's plan is better for the city as a whole, as is clear from the fact that the principal supporter of Ripley's plan is Smith Stores. Smith Stores, with its highly paid consultants, knows where its own interest lies and, moreover, has supported its own interests in the past, even to the detriment of the city as a whole.

The faulty reasoning in which one of the following is most parallel to that in the argument above?

(A) Surely Centreville should oppose adoption of the regional planning commission's new plan since it is not in Centreville's interest, even though it might be in the interest of some towns in the region.

(B) The school board should support the plan for the new high school since this plan was recommended by the well-qualified consultants whom the school board hired at great expense.

(C) Of the two budget proposals, the mayor's is clearly preferable to the city council's, since the mayor's budget addresses the needs of the city as a whole, whereas the city council is protecting special interests.

(D) Nomura is clearly a better candidate for college president than Miller, since Nomura has the support of the three deans who best understand the president's job and with whom the president will have to work most closely.

(E) The planned light-rail system will clearly serve suburban areas well, since its main opponent is the city government, which has always ignored the needs of the suburbs and sought only to protect the interests of the city.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Wed Jun 20, 2018 6:47 am
After a critical analyses of the options below, here is the drawn out analyses for each option.

Option A - INCORRECT.
This statement was in support of the selfish interest of the minister even though, it seeks not to to be in support of the whole city but rather in the interest of few.

Option B - INCORRECT.
This is an assumption and confusable proposal made for the people to support the ministers proposal by the highly paid and recognized consultant of the minister, even though they are not fully aware of the selfish interest of the minister in the past, and that his present proposal is still not going to be favorable to the city and its people.

Option C - CORRECT.
This statement has rightly defined and give meaning to the question. It has critically defined the two proposal submitted by the ministers, as one tends to be more favorable to the whole city while, the other seeks to be of highly selfish interest and favorable to just one person ''the minister'' who has been ruling them for a while now. This conviction was successful due to the help of the highly recognized consultant the minister had and which the people also trust.

Option D -INCORRECT.
Reverse is the case in this option, had it been that the minister with the good interest proposal was voted in for it would have been good, but, it wasn't so when the people started believing the selfish interest of the ruling minister over their own interest.

Option E - INCORRECT
However, the interest of the whole city would have been accomplished if the other proposal was accepted but rather it wasn't and the selfish minister was able to gain the heart of the people. This option doesn't interpret the question.
Join the discussion