BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Of the 60.....

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by kstv » Sat Jun 05, 2010 7:31 pm
Of 60 animals, 2/3 are either pigs or cows = 40
1) Twice as many cows as pigs, but 40 is not perfectly divisible by 3
so it can be 26 cows and 14 pigs , but 26 is not twice of 14
rather it must be 27 cows and 13 pigs . Suff.
2) More than 12 pigs , so less than 28 cows. Insuff.
Together also Insufficient.
IMO A
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Sat Jun 05, 2010 10:55 pm
From the original, we know that 40 animals are either pigs or cows, or 40 = p + c

(2): clearly insufficient.

(1) "The farm has more than twice as many cows as it has pigs" means:

c>2p

(@kstv, I think you read (1) as "the farm has twice as many cows as it has pigs"!)

Insufficient.

Combined, we know that:

c and p are positive integers;
(I) c+p = 40;
(II) c>2p; and
(III) p>12

(we also know that c>p+12 but that doesn't matter).

(III) tells us p>12. Say p is 13. From (I), c would then be 27. Checking against (II), is 27>2*13? Yes. So, p = 13, and c = 27 is one solution set, but just barely. As you can see, if we were to increase p to 14, then from (I), c would have to be 26 but since 26 is not > 2*14, (II) would then be breached.

Thus, p is 13, and c is 27.

Choose C.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by Patrick_GMATFix » Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:37 am
One mistake many test-takers make is to neglect to translate inequalities as they would translate equations (express relationships in algebraic terms)

60 animals. 2/3, or 40 are pigs or cows. So p+c=40. What is c?

(1) there coul be 39 cows and 1 pig, or 38 cows and 2 pigs. More than twice as many cows as pigs is not helpful to find the number of cows. NOT SUFFICIENT

(2) Essentially since the pigs & cows must add up to 40, because there are more than 12 pigs there must be fewer than 28 cows. The exact number of cows is unknown. NOT SUFFICIENT.

MERGE STATEMENTS.
There more than 12 pigs. (1) told us that cows is more than double of pigs. If there were 13 pigs, there would be 27 cows. There cannot be 14 pigs because the number of cows would have to be more than twice that, or more than 28. This would take the total over 40 and thus is not a possibility. There must be 13 pigs and 27 cows.

The answer is C.

This is GMATPrep question 1030. Have a look at the step-by-step video solution if this explanation doesn't make sense. You could also use the Drill Engine to generate timed drills with similar questions (set topic='inequalities' and difficulty='600-700')

-Patrick
  • Ask me about tutoring.
Join the discussion

by Thouraya » Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:05 pm
I have two questions regarding this post:

1) isn't there only ONE combination of numbers for C & P that satisfy these two conditions at the same time: 40=c+p AND c>2P? (thus one is sufficient?)

2) The question does not say that we only have cows and animals in the farm, why are we assuming so?

Thanks!
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Sat Jun 12, 2010 12:35 pm
Hi Thouraya,
1) isn't there only ONE combination of numbers for C & P that satisfy these two conditions at the same time: 40=c+p AND c>2P? (thus one is sufficient?)
No, there are several! You can have 30 cows and 10 pigs. Is 30 + 10 = 40? Yes. Is 30>2*(10)? Yes. But we can also have 35 cows and 5 pigs. Is 35 + 5 = 40? Yes. Is 35>2*(5)? Yes. Remember, it's c>2p not c = 2p.

2) The question does not say that we only have cows and animals in the farm, why are we assuming so?
We're not! We know there are 60 animals. Of these, we know that 2/3 or 40 are either cows or pigs. So, 40 are either cows or pigs, so c + p = 40. We don't care about the other 20 animals, although we know that they are neither cows nor pigs.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion