BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

numbers of vs the number of vs a number of

Expert replies
by femkel » Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:13 pm
The more I study this, the more confused I seem to be getting.

According to the Manhattan guide, "The numberS of" is almost always wrong, but when is it right? Some forum discussions state that if there is an adjective between "the" and "numbers" then it is correct to pluralize 'numbers'... is that true?

Also, I know "numbers" is correct for comparisons and you must use greater than but not "more than." But what must you use to express a smaller quantity? less?

When exactly must you use "numbers" instead of "the number of"
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by BastiG » Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:38 pm
Here is a example when you use numbers:

New Jersey's is one of the five highest number of reported cases of Lyme disease in the United States.
(A) New Jersey's is one of the five highest number of reported
(B) New Jersey's is one of the five highest numbers in reporting
(C) New Jersey has a report of one of the five highest numbers of
(D) New Jersey has one of the five highest numbers of reported
(E) New Jersey reports one of the five highest number of

You use numbers because there is a set of numbers and not just one number. (D) is the right answer. But I think you can't use "the numbers of". There should be a modifying adjective such as "five highest" or "varying".

For example varying numbers:
This month in the journal Nature, Justin Halberda and Lisa Feigenson of Johns Hopkins University and Michele Mazzocco of the Kennedy Krieger Institute in Baltimore described their study of 64 14-year-olds who were tested at length on the discriminating power of their approximate number sense. The teenagers sat at a computer as a series of slides with varying numbers of yellow and blue dots flashed on a screen for 200 milliseconds each - barely as long as an eye blink. After each slide, the students pressed a button indicating whether they thought there had been more yellow dots or blue.

Source: NYT

If this post helped you than give me a thanks. =)
I don't understand the second part of your question. Can you give an example?
Join the discussion

by paes » Tue Aug 31, 2010 12:59 am
when you use a 'article' before number then 'numbers' is wrong
otherwise 'numbers' can be fine.

A number of students [ correct] : -> numbers wrong

The number of students [ Correct ] -> numbers wrong
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1