Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Number Theory Problem

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by kvcpk » Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:20 am
Let me put them as a,b,c for our notation. So a,b,c are different,non-zero single digit numbers
now,
ab * ba =cbca
and
a(a+c) = b

a(a+c) = b
we know that b is a single digit
product of two single digits giving a single digit
how many cases:
1* (1+{2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9} )

Hence a=1 - Let us keep this for some time..

another possibility..
2*(2+1)
because c cannot be 2 if a=2. [different digits]
c cannot be 3 because b will become 10.
so a=2, c=1 -> let us keep this also aside

next:
3*(3+0)
this is not possible because c cannot be 0. And if c is greater than 0 them b is more than 10.

So for any value of "a" greater than 2, we will not have a feasible solution.

So now a has to be either 1 or 2.
when a=2, c=1, b= 6
coming to our other equation:
ab * ba =cbca
26*62=1612

This is satisfied.

Let us see what if a=1?
Look at the last digit of the product -> b*a is yielding last digit as "a"
if a=1, then last digit will be "b" and not "a"

Hence a cannot equal 1.

hence ab = 26
Join the discussion

by albatross86 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:25 am
Here's how I did it. It's a bit unconventional, so looking fwd to better explanations!

Rephrase problem as :

=>xy
* yx
____
zyzx

We also have x(x+z) = y

Start with this info to narrow down possibilities.

1. Since x,y and z are all different non-zero single digit integers, we can infer that y is a multiple of x, and since y cannot be equal to x, it must be 2x, 3x, etc.

2. Since minimum value of y is 2x and maximum value is 9, we can also infer that x < 5 since 2*5 = 10 which violates our single-digit constraint for y.

So this leaves our possible values of x and y as :
x = 1, y = 2,3,...
x = 2, y = 4,6,8
x= 3, y = 6,9
x = 4, y = 8

Now we add our final constraint which is visible from the product. The units digit of the product is "x" so this means that the product of x*y must have a units digit of x.

x= 1 will give units digit of 2,3,... but not 1.
x = 2 gives us a units digit of 2 when y = 6

Test this to see if it satisfies our condition: 26*62 = 1612 => z = 1 which satisfies x(x+z) = y

Pick 26.
~Abhay

Believe those who are seeking the truth. Doubt those who find it. -- Andre Gide
Join the discussion