BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Number properties

Expert replies
by nakul17 » Thu Oct 10, 2013 10:02 pm
If , where both s and t are prime numbers, does s@t = 1?

(1) s + t (not equal to) 4

(2) s/t (not equal to) 1

Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not.
Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not.
Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient.
EITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question.
Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question, requiring more data pertaining to the problem.[/spoiler][/list]
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by theCodeToGMAT » Thu Oct 10, 2013 10:39 pm
s@t = ts/(t+s)

For RHS to be "1" .. t&S must be same.

Statement 1:
s+t != 4
So, both are not "2"
SUFFICIENT

Statement 2:
s/t != 1
So, both are not same.
SUFFICIENT

Answer [spoiler]{D}[/spoiler]
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Oct 11, 2013 6:12 am
nakul17 wrote:If , where both s and t are prime numbers, does s@t = 1?

(1) s + t (not equal to) 4

(2) s/t (not equal to) 1

Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not.
Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not.
Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient.
EITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question.
Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question, requiring more data pertaining to the problem.[/spoiler][/list]


Once you post a question, please take a moment to ensure that you've transcribed it correctly. There is obviously some information missing here.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Oct 11, 2013 7:33 am
NOTE: I added the necessary information to the question below.
nakul17 wrote:If s@t = ts/(t+s), where both s and t are prime numbers, does s@t = 1?

(1) s + t ≠ 4
(2) s/t ≠ 1
This is a great candidate for rephrasing the target question. In fact, if we spend a bit of time rephrasing the target question, we can solve the question quickly. (Aside: We have a free video with tips on rephrasing the target question: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... cy?id=1100)

Target question: Does s@t = 1?
In other words, does ts/(t+s) = 1?
We can also word this as: does (t+s)/ts = 1?
Or we can write: does t/ts + s/ts = 1?
Simplify to get: does 1/s + 1/t = 1?

IMPORTANT: since s and t are prime numbers, we know that s > 2, and t > 2
When s = 2 and t = 2, it's true that 1/s + 1/t = 1
If s > 2 and t > 2, then 1/s < 0.5 and 1/t < 0.5. Since it's impossible to two values less than 0.5 to add to 1, we can see that 1/s + 1/t ≠ 1 if s > 2 and t > 2

In other words, THE ONLY WAY that 1/s + 1/t can equal 1 is if s = 2 and t = 2.
So, we can rephrase our target question as . . .
REPHRASED target question: Does s = t = 2?

Statement 1: s + t ≠ 4
If s + t ≠ 4, then it is IMPOSSIBLE for s = t = 2
Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: s/t ≠ 1
If s/t ≠ 1, then it is IMPOSSIBLE for s = t = 2
Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer = D

Cheers,
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Oct 11, 2013 10:46 am
nakul17 wrote:If s@t = st/(s+t), where both s and t are prime numbers, does s@t = 1?

(1) s + t (not equal to) 4

(2) s/t (not equal to) 1
It can be helpful to rephrase the question stem so that one variable is IN TERMS OF THE OTHER.

st/(s+t) = 1
st = s+t
st - s = t
s(t-1) = t
s = t/(t-1).

t and t-1 are CONSECUTIVE INTEGERS.
For s to be a prime number such that s = t/(t-1) -- the quotient of two consecutive integers -- only one case is possible:
t-1 = 1, implying that t=2 and that s = 2/(2-1) = 2.
Thus, s = t/(t-1) only if s=2 and t=2.

Question rephrased: Does s=t=2?

Statement 1: s+t ≠ 4.
Thus, it is not possible that s=t=2.
SUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: s/t ≠ 1.
Thus, it is not possilbe that s=t=2.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion