BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Number Properties + Decimals!!

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by sreak1089 » Mon Jan 18, 2010 8:39 am
I think ans is D IMO, Are you sure the OA is B?
Join the discussion

by apoorva.srivastva » Mon Jan 18, 2010 8:56 am
yes ans is B

statement 1:

for 0.49+0.49<1,
for 0.56+0.56>1

insufficent
Join the discussion

by sreak1089 » Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:26 am
oh yeah. you are right.. dammn my brain isn't working :(
Join the discussion

by apoorva.srivastva » Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:29 am
sreak1089 wrote:oh yeah. you are right.. dammn my brain isn't working :(
how do i attack statement B
Join the discussion

by sreak1089 » Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:57 am
For the product 0.ab and 0.cd to be > 0.5, I think 0.ab & 0.cd each should be > 0.5, thus the sum will be > 1.
Hence B is SUFFICIENT. Do you agree?
apoorva.srivastva wrote:
sreak1089 wrote:oh yeah. you are right.. dammn my brain isn't working :(
how do i attack statement B
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:19 pm
sreak1089 wrote:For the product 0.ab and 0.cd to be > 0.5, I think 0.ab & 0.cd each should be > 0.5, thus the sum will be > 1.
Hence B is SUFFICIENT. Do you agree?
Correct.

If we had 1 * .5, we'd get .5. Since our first number has to be smaller than 1, our second number has to be greater than .5, giving us two numbers each of which is greater than .5.

Accordingly, the question becomes:

"Is the sum of two numbers greater than .5 more than 1?"

and we can definitely answer this with a "yes".
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by Due » Mon Jan 18, 2010 3:20 pm
use the fact that Arithmetic mean is greater than geometric mean. That will make it easy.
Join the discussion