BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Number/Numbers

Expert replies
by Onell » Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:57 pm
1.Having more than the usual number of fingers or toes on the hands or feet is termed polydactyly. --MGMT
2.New Jersey has one of the five highest numbers of reported cases of Lyme disease in the United States. -TEST PAPERS
3A Labor Department study states that the number of women employed outside the home increased by more than thirty-five percent in the past decade and accounted for more than sixty-two percent of the total growth in the civilian work force. --OG
4.The gryfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's. --OG

All above are the correct sentences either from OG or some other reputed sources.In first and 3rd sentences NUMBERS is used whereas in 2 nd and 4th "NUMBER " is used. Can someone highlight the important differences between Number vs Numbers? when to choose one over another?

Thank you
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by GmatKiss » Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:36 am
Onell wrote:1.Having more than the usual number of fingers or toes on the hands or feet is termed polydactyly. --MGMT
2.New Jersey has one of the five highest numbers of reported cases of Lyme disease in the United States. -TEST PAPERS
3A Labor Department study states that the number of women employed outside the home increased by more than thirty-five percent in the past decade and accounted for more than sixty-two percent of the total growth in the civilian work force. --OG
4.The gryfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's. --OG

It has to co-exist with the verb

All above are the correct sentences either from OG or some other reputed sources.In first and 3rd sentences NUMBERS is used whereas in 2 nd and 4th "NUMBER " is used. Can someone highlight the important differences between Number vs Numbers? when to choose one over another?

Thank you
Join the discussion

by tuanquang269 » Thu Nov 17, 2011 7:22 am
The numbers of or A numbers of is always wrong.

Your example above:
2.New Jersey has one of the five highest numbers of reported cases of Lyme disease in the United States. -TEST PAPERS

4.The gryfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's. --OG

Be aware with some words follow numbers.

You can see more from this thread: https://www.beatthegmat.com/numbers-of-i ... 39059.html

Hey guys

So, technically "THE numbers of" or "A numbers of" is wrong - that whole thing, including the article in front, not just "numbers of." You can have "numbers of" without those articles, as in the example at the top of the thread.

(You can also, technically, have "the numbers of" if you are literally talking about multiple numbers - eg, two players have the numbers 7 and 13 on their jerseys, and I say "the numbers of the jerseys are 7 and 13." But that kind of set-up would be very unusual on this test.)

Also, remember that there's almost always an obscure exception to any rule you can think of. Annoying, but true. ("Being" is not always wrong either - it's just almost always wrong on the GMAT.) Because of the frequent, obscure exceptions, we should mostly just worry about the most likely / primary rules. Otherwise, we'll drive ourselves crazy. - from Stacey Instructor
Hope that helps
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1