BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Number Line x, y and z

Expert replies
by srisl11 » Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:27 pm
On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?

(1) xyz<0
(2) xy<0

OA E

This question was asked long back...Is there a better solution for this
https://www.beatthegmat.com/number-line-t20267.html

Please help me and thanks in advance
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by mals24 » Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:53 am
Given: distance between x & y is greater than distance between x & z

[absolute value = abs]

abs (x-y)>abs(x-z)

1. xyz<0
INSUFF as we cannot determine either the individual values or the signs of x,yorz.

2. xy<0
Either x is positive or y is positive.
INSUFF no information about z.

Combining 1 + 2

xy = negative
xyz = negative

Hence z is positive.

So our number line would like either of the three lines:

1. x----0-z-----y
2. y----0-z-----x
3. y------0--x--z

In all the 3 cases abs(x-y)>abs(x-z).
But we still cannot determine if z lies in the middle of x&y....INSUFF

Answer is E.

Hope it helps :)
Last edited by mals24 on Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:15 am
I think this case is possible too:

y----------0----x----z

Mals covered most of it in his post!

E)
Join the discussion

by mals24 » Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:39 am
Mals covered most of it in his post!
Subject and pronoun don't agree ;)

Ohh I missed the 4th case, thanks for mentioning cramya :)

Actually the 3rd case I mentioned cannot be possible since z is positive. It should actually be the case you've mentioned.

Previous post edited.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:50 am
Lets not get in to SC now. Thats not my forte :-) Jus kidding!

Hoping it will soon..... Good luck, Mals!
Join the discussion

by mals24 » Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:18 am
Lolz no I meant I'm a girl not a guy so the his is wrong.

Sorry srisl11 for going off topic, but if you still have doubts with this question feel free to ask.
Join the discussion

by srisl11 » Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:41 am
mals24 wrote:Lolz no I meant I'm a girl not a guy so the his is wrong.

Sorry srisl11 for going off topic, but if you still have doubts with this question feel free to ask.

Thanks mals24 and Cramya for your help.....

I think humor will make the posts more interesting.... :D
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:15 am
Hi Ian,
Solving this inequality I came to following equn:

|X-Y| > |X-Z|

Solving for all possibilities:

x-y > x-z or y<z
x-y > -(x-z) or x>1/2(y+z)
-(x-y) > -(x-z) or y>z
-(x-y) > x-z or x<1/2(y+z)

now how I can use these contradictory facts, it leads to nowhere?

Similarly I find the the two options lacking steps to move algebrically ahead.

Please comment.
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Fri Jan 15, 2010 3:33 am
maihuna wrote:Hi Ian,
Solving this inequality I came to following equn:

|X-Y| > |X-Z|

Solving for all possibilities:

x-y > x-z or y<z
x-y > -(x-z) or x>1/2(y+z)
-(x-y) > -(x-z) or y>z
-(x-y) > x-z or x<1/2(y+z)

now how I can use these contradictory facts, it leads to nowhere?

Similarly I find the the two options lacking steps to move algebrically ahead.

Please comment.
pls help on this !!
Join the discussion

by missrochelle » Mon Aug 23, 2010 4:45 pm
mals24 wrote:Given: distance between x & y is greater than distance between x & z

[absolute value = abs]

abs (x-y)>abs(x-z)

1. xyz<0
INSUFF as we cannot determine either the individual values or the signs of x,yorz.

2. xy<0
Either x is positive or y is positive.
INSUFF no information about z.

Combining 1 + 2

xy = negative
xyz = negative

Hence z is positive.

So our number line would like either of the three lines:

1. x----0-z-----y
2. y----0-z-----x
3. y------0--x--z

In all the 3 cases abs(x-y)>abs(x-z).
But we still cannot determine if z lies in the middle of x&y....INSUFF

Answer is E.

Hope it helps :)
Why do we assume z is positive? If XYZ is negative - and xy is negative , Z can be positive or negative.

Also - whats the quick way of creating the number lines without having to think about "real numbers" ...when I tried it took me nearly 4 minutes to come up with how the number lines might look!
Join the discussion