Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Number Line x, y and z

Expert replies
by srisl11 » Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:27 pm
On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?

(1) xyz<0
(2) xy<0

OA E

This question was asked long back...Is there a better solution for this
https://www.beatthegmat.com/number-line-t20267.html

Please help me and thanks in advance
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by mals24 » Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:53 am
Given: distance between x & y is greater than distance between x & z

[absolute value = abs]

abs (x-y)>abs(x-z)

1. xyz<0
INSUFF as we cannot determine either the individual values or the signs of x,yorz.

2. xy<0
Either x is positive or y is positive.
INSUFF no information about z.

Combining 1 + 2

xy = negative
xyz = negative

Hence z is positive.

So our number line would like either of the three lines:

1. x----0-z-----y
2. y----0-z-----x
3. y------0--x--z

In all the 3 cases abs(x-y)>abs(x-z).
But we still cannot determine if z lies in the middle of x&y....INSUFF

Answer is E.

Hope it helps :)
Last edited by mals24 on Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:15 am
I think this case is possible too:

y----------0----x----z

Mals covered most of it in his post!

E)
Join the discussion

by mals24 » Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:39 am
Mals covered most of it in his post!
Subject and pronoun don't agree ;)

Ohh I missed the 4th case, thanks for mentioning cramya :)

Actually the 3rd case I mentioned cannot be possible since z is positive. It should actually be the case you've mentioned.

Previous post edited.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:50 am
Lets not get in to SC now. Thats not my forte :-) Jus kidding!

Hoping it will soon..... Good luck, Mals!
Join the discussion

by mals24 » Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:18 am
Lolz no I meant I'm a girl not a guy so the his is wrong.

Sorry srisl11 for going off topic, but if you still have doubts with this question feel free to ask.
Join the discussion

by srisl11 » Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:41 am
mals24 wrote:Lolz no I meant I'm a girl not a guy so the his is wrong.

Sorry srisl11 for going off topic, but if you still have doubts with this question feel free to ask.

Thanks mals24 and Cramya for your help.....

I think humor will make the posts more interesting.... :D
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Wed Apr 15, 2009 7:15 am
Hi Ian,
Solving this inequality I came to following equn:

|X-Y| > |X-Z|

Solving for all possibilities:

x-y > x-z or y<z
x-y > -(x-z) or x>1/2(y+z)
-(x-y) > -(x-z) or y>z
-(x-y) > x-z or x<1/2(y+z)

now how I can use these contradictory facts, it leads to nowhere?

Similarly I find the the two options lacking steps to move algebrically ahead.

Please comment.
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Fri Jan 15, 2010 3:33 am
maihuna wrote:Hi Ian,
Solving this inequality I came to following equn:

|X-Y| > |X-Z|

Solving for all possibilities:

x-y > x-z or y<z
x-y > -(x-z) or x>1/2(y+z)
-(x-y) > -(x-z) or y>z
-(x-y) > x-z or x<1/2(y+z)

now how I can use these contradictory facts, it leads to nowhere?

Similarly I find the the two options lacking steps to move algebrically ahead.

Please comment.
pls help on this !!
Join the discussion

by missrochelle » Mon Aug 23, 2010 4:45 pm
mals24 wrote:Given: distance between x & y is greater than distance between x & z

[absolute value = abs]

abs (x-y)>abs(x-z)

1. xyz<0
INSUFF as we cannot determine either the individual values or the signs of x,yorz.

2. xy<0
Either x is positive or y is positive.
INSUFF no information about z.

Combining 1 + 2

xy = negative
xyz = negative

Hence z is positive.

So our number line would like either of the three lines:

1. x----0-z-----y
2. y----0-z-----x
3. y------0--x--z

In all the 3 cases abs(x-y)>abs(x-z).
But we still cannot determine if z lies in the middle of x&y....INSUFF

Answer is E.

Hope it helps :)
Why do we assume z is positive? If XYZ is negative - and xy is negative , Z can be positive or negative.

Also - whats the quick way of creating the number lines without having to think about "real numbers" ...when I tried it took me nearly 4 minutes to come up with how the number lines might look!
Join the discussion