BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Number line

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by liferocks » Tue May 25, 2010 10:42 pm
From 1
two of x,y and z has same sign.
So
scenario 1: if x and y has same sign and z different (ex x and y +ve and z -ve) then z does not lie between x and y
scenario 2: if x and z has same sign and y different and z>x (ex x and z +ve and y -ve) then z does not lie between x and y
scenario 3:if x is negative and z and y +ve ,z lies between x and y ..not sufficient

from 2
x and y has different sign..no information about z..not sufficient

combining,
scenario 2 and 3 of condition 1 shows this and its not sufficient

Ans option E
"If you don't know where you are going, any road will get you there."
Lewis Carroll
Join the discussion

by tpr-becky » Wed May 26, 2010 10:13 am
We need some method of determining where exactly these numbers lie in relation to each other.

statement 1 says that either one of the numbers is negative or all three are negative - but it give no indication to which one - x could be between y and z or z could be between y and x. Insufficient

statemetn 2 - says that either x or y is negative - this doesn't say anything about z so we dont' know.

if you put them together you know that x or y is negative and z is positive but we don't know if x is in the middle or if z is in the middle - becuase there is no way to determine the relationship between the numbers the answer is E.
Last edited by tpr-becky on Wed May 26, 2010 10:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Join the discussion

by selango » Wed May 26, 2010 10:25 am
tpr-becky wrote:We need some method of determining where exactly these numbers lie in relation to each other.

statement 1 says that either one of the numbers is negative or all three are negative - but it give no indication to which one - x could be between y and z or z could be between y and x. Insufficient

statemetn 2 - says that either x or y is negative - this doesn't say anything about z so we dont' know.

if you put them together you know that all three numbers are negative but we don't know if x is in the middle or if z is in the middle - becuase there is no way to determine the relationship between the numbers the answer is E.

Becky,

one doubt here..if we combine 2 stmts,if xy is -ve,z can be +ve so that xyz<0..


Pls clarify
Join the discussion

by tpr-becky » Wed May 26, 2010 10:53 am
correct, I have edited my post - but the reasoning still stands.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Join the discussion

by Patrick_GMATFix » Wed May 26, 2010 1:51 pm
We know that XY is longer than XZ. Is Z between X and Y?

(1) We either have all three negatives, or 1 negative and 2 positives. We could have x=-1, y=-3 and z=-2. In this case, the answer to the original Q would be YES. on the other hand we could have x=-1, y=-3 and z=-0.5. In this case, the answer to the original Q would be NO Z is not between the others. Insufficient

(2) This tells us nothing about the location of Z. but tells us that either X or Y, but not both, is negative. Insufficient.

Merging the statements, we can deduce that either:
x is negative; y is positive; z is positive. OR
y is negative; x is positive; z is positive.

It's still possible to come up with values that answer the original Q with a YES (Z is between the other 2) or a NO (Z is to the right of the other 2, but really close to X which is in the middle). We don't have sufficiency. The answer is E.

This is GMATPrep question 1037. You can practice similar questions if you have access to the Solutions Engine drill generator by selecting topic="Inequalities & Absolute Values" and difficulty="600-700"


Good luck,
-Patrick
Join the discussion