BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

number line

Expert replies
by gmat740 » Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:27 am
----r---- s---- t---
On the number line shown, is zero halfway between r and s?
1). s is to the right of zero
2). the distance between t and r is the same as the distance between t and -s.
[spoiler]OA-C
IMO-B[/spoiler]
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: number line

by jakesing » Mon Jun 15, 2009 8:43 am
gmat740 wrote:----r---- s---- t---
On the number line shown, is zero halfway between r and s?
1). s is to the right of zero
2). the distance between t and r is the same as the distance between t and -s.
[spoiler]OA-C
IMO-B[/spoiler]
I almost made the same mistake as you did, but consider this:

r=-5, s=-3, t=-1. -s=3, so this would work with 2, but would not be sufficient to answer the question.
Join the discussion

Re: number line

by Vemuri » Mon Jun 15, 2009 10:46 pm
Good question Karan. I got tricked as well.
Join the discussion

by ssmiles08 » Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:18 am
Can someone explain this in detail please...I am having trouble understanding the concept here.

taking all numbers to be positive I get -r = s. After that I seem to derail :(

Thanks
Join the discussion

by Vemuri » Tue Jun 16, 2009 6:47 am
ssmiles08 wrote:Can someone explain this in detail please...I am having trouble understanding the concept here.

taking all numbers to be positive I get -r = s. After that I seem to derail :(

Thanks
We basically need to find out if '0' comes in between r & s on the number line.

The question stem does not say that r,s & t are positive integers. So, given the information in Statement 2, if t=-1 s=-3 & r=-5, then -s=3. The distance between t & r is 4 & the distance between t & -s is also 4. But 0 is not between r & s. Now, if we consider t=1, s=3 & r=5, then -s=-3. The distance between t & r is 4 & the distance between t & -s is also 4. But in this condition 0 comes in between r & s. So, this statement alone is not sufficient.

Both statements combined allows us to answer the question. Hence C. Hope this helps you get back on track :-)
Join the discussion

by ssmiles08 » Tue Jun 16, 2009 7:49 am
Vemuri wrote:
ssmiles08 wrote:Can someone explain this in detail please...I am having trouble understanding the concept here.

taking all numbers to be positive I get -r = s. After that I seem to derail :(

Thanks
We basically need to find out if '0' comes in between r & s on the number line.

The question stem does not say that r,s & t are positive integers. So, given the information in Statement 2, if t=-1 s=-3 & r=-5, then -s=3. The distance between t & r is 4 & the distance between t & -s is also 4. But 0 is not between r & s. Now, if we consider t=1, s=3 & r=5, then -s=-3. The distance between t & r is 4 & the distance between t & -s is also 4. But in this condition 0 comes in between r & s. So, this statement alone is not sufficient.

Both statements combined allows us to answer the question. Hence C. Hope this helps you get back on track :-)
I see it!! thank you! :)
Join the discussion