BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Nova vs Rebound

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 682
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 2:40 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 32 times
by Vemuri » Sun Mar 01, 2009 5:38 pm
Jill: In our survey 53% of those questioned said they used Nova Running shoes for jogging and 47% said they used Rebound Running shoes for jogging.

Jack: In that case everyone questioned used one product or the other.

Jill: No, 24% said they didn't use either one.

Jill's statements imply that:

A. not all of those questioned liked to go jogging.
B. Some of those who said they used either Nova or Rebound Running shoes for jogging were lying.
C. Some of those who said they used either Nova Running shoes for jogging were among those who also used Rebound Running shoes for jogging.
D. Some of those who used neither product were nevertheless familiar with Nova and Rebound Running shoes
E. Many Nova and Rebound Running shoes are actually made in the same factory in various international locations.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pmFollowed by: 11 members
Thanked: 331 times

by cramya » Sun Mar 01, 2009 5:50 pm
This looked like a quant question.

I would go with C

Total = grp1+grp2-both+neither

both=34


Since its a inference questions the answer choice can always be proved by referring back to the facts in the stimulus.


Some of those who said they used either Nova Running shoes for jogging were among those who also used Rebound Running shoes for jogging
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 2:50 am

by delhiboy1979 » Mon Mar 02, 2009 2:55 am
I can narrow down to either B or C. Assuming that almost 24% are lying seems far fetched so would go with C.

Rest of the options are either irrlevant or directly mentioned in the stimulus (not inferred).
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:30 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 15 times

by schumi_gmat » Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:37 pm
@Cramya
Total = grp1+grp2-both+neither

both=34
This is correct.

I thought that both would come to 24% I did not get 34.

100 = 47+53-both+24

both = 24.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pmFollowed by: 11 members
Thanked: 331 times

by cramya » Mon Mar 02, 2009 3:14 pm
I thought that both would come to 24% I did not get 34.

100 = 47+53-both+24

both = 24
U r right!

Carelessness at its peak when I put the 34 number. Adding basic subtraction techniques to my revision list :D

Regards,
CR
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 160
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 7:10 pm
Thanked: 10 times
GMAT Score:600

by dendude » Tue Mar 03, 2009 1:41 pm
I choose C too.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:58 am

by vanessa.m » Sat May 14, 2016 2:43 am
Option C looks good
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1