BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Not Sure- Than people did who

Expert replies
by [email protected] » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:41 pm
A recent study, published by the California Bureau of Employment, found that people who sent in resumes with "ethnic-sounding" names had a much more difficult time getting called back from employers as people who sent in resumes showing similar qualifications but "white-sounding" names.


employers as people who sent in resumes showing similar qualifications but "white-sounding" names.


employers as those who did send in resumes showing similar qualifications but with "white-sounding" names.


employers than those who sent in resumes showing similar qualifications but "white-sounding" names.


employers than those who did send in resumes showing similar qualifications but with "white-sounding" names.


employers than people did who sent in resumes showing similar qualifications but with "white-sounding" names.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by perwinsharma » Sat Jul 26, 2014 11:06 pm
Hi

Noe that this a comparison and parallelism question.
In a comparison question, 'x' more than 'y' is the correct form.
In parallelism, 'x' and 'y' should have the same structure.

A) uses 'more........as' which is wrong.
B) uses 'more.........as' which is wrong
C) it says 'who sent in resumes showing similar qualifications but "white-sounding" names'.....misses the parallel structure because of the word 'with'
D) 'those' - ambiguous as we can't say whether it refers to employers or those who send in the applications
E) Correct
Praveen Sharma
Wizius Careers
Gurgaon
India
https://www.facebook.com/wiziuscareergmat/
Join the discussion

by theCodeToGMAT » Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:00 pm
[email protected] wrote:A recent study, published by the California Bureau of Employment, found that people who sent in resumes with "ethnic-sounding" names had a much more difficult time getting called back from employers as people who sent in resumes showing similar qualifications but "white-sounding" names.

employers as people who sent in resumes showing similar qualifications but "white-sounding" names.
--> we need "than"

employers as those who did send in resumes showing similar qualifications but with "white-sounding" names.
--> we need "than"

employers than those who sent in resumes showing similar qualifications but "white-sounding" names.
--> We need "with" to maintain the parallelism with "with "ethnic-sounding" names"

employers than those who did send in resumes showing similar qualifications but with "white-sounding" names.
--> We don't need "did"; it breaks the parallelism with "who sent in resumes"

employers than people did who sent in resumes showing similar qualifications but with "white-sounding" names.
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:09 am
[email protected] wrote:A recent study, published by the California Bureau of Employment, found that people who sent in resumes with "ethnic-sounding" names had a much more difficult time getting called back from employers as people who sent in resumes showing similar qualifications but "white-sounding" names.


employers as people who sent in resumes showing similar qualifications but "white-sounding" names.


employers as those who did send in resumes showing similar qualifications but with "white-sounding" names.


employers than those who sent in resumes showing similar qualifications but "white-sounding" names.


employers than those who did send in resumes showing similar qualifications but with "white-sounding" names.


employers than people did who sent in resumes showing similar qualifications but with "white-sounding" names.
What is the source of this SC?
The non-underlined portion does not convey the intended meaning.

People who sent in resumes with "ethnic-sounding" names had a much more difficult time getting called back from employers.
The intended meaning seems to be that employers did not call back people who had submitted resumes with "ethnic-sounding" names.
The sentence above does not convey this meaning.

Here, getting seems to be serving as an adjective.
If getting refers to a difficult time, the implication is that A DIFFICULT TIME was getting called back -- a nonsensical meaning.
If getting refers to people, the implication is that people with "ethnic-sounding names" were in fact getting called back -- the OPPOSITE of the intended meaning.

Also, to be called back from X means to be asked to RETURN FROM X.
John was called back from the island.
Conveyed meaning:
John was asked to RETURN FROM THE ISLAND.
Thus, getting called back from employers implies that people with "ethic-sounding names" were being asked to LEAVE the employers -- not the intended meaning.

Ignore this SC.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1