BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

No option with "such as" ?

Expert replies
by prachi18oct » Fri Jul 24, 2015 3:21 pm
More than have any of its competitors, Dynacorp, which will release its annual earnings report on Friday, is staking its future on the business of bringing shale gas from formerly inaccessible locations like the Arctic and energy-hungry nations like India and China.

A) More than have any of its competitors, Dynacorp, which will release its annual earnings report on Friday, is staking its future on the business of bringing shale gas from formerly inaccessible locations like the Arctic and energy-hungry nations like India and China.
B) More than has any of its competitors, Dynacorp, which will release its annual earnings report on Friday, has staked its future on the business of bringing shale gas from formerly inaccessible locations like the Arctic to energy-hungry nations like India and China.
C) More so than any of its competitors, Dynacorp, which will release its annual earnings report on Friday, is staking its future on the business of bringing shale gas from formerly inaccessible locations like the Arctic and energy-hungry nations such as India and China.
D) More than any of its competitors have, Dynacorp, which will release its annual earnings report on Friday, staked its future on the business of bringing shale gas from formerly inaccessible locations like the Arctic and energy-hungry nations such as India and China.
E) More than any of its competitors, Dynacorp, which will release its annual earnings report on Friday, is staking its future on the business of bringing shale gas from formerly inaccessible locations like the Arctic to energy-hungry nations like India and China.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by OptimusPrep » Sat Jul 25, 2015 12:47 am
Can you please tell me what is your doubt?
Join the discussion

by prachi18oct » Sat Jul 25, 2015 7:44 am
The examples should use "such as" and not like. but here in all options we see "like" is used for examples for inaccessible locations. How and why is this SC not incorrect ? Is this construction acceptable on GMAT ?
Join the discussion

by TheGmatTutor » Mon Jul 27, 2015 2:43 pm
It really can only be E, since this is the only option with the correct meaning and no grammatical errors. When referring to India and China either "like" or "such as" could be correct. It would probably be more correct to use such as to introduce a list of examples.
If this post was helpful, please click the "Thanks" button.
Join the discussion

by OptimusPrep » Mon Jul 27, 2015 7:32 pm
As the GMAT Tutor said, E is the only option with no other errors.
So, we have no choice but to go for the option E
Join the discussion

by Mo2men » Fri Dec 29, 2017 3:24 pm
prachi18oct wrote:More than have any of its competitors, Dynacorp, which will release its annual earnings report on Friday, is staking its future on the business of bringing shale gas from formerly inaccessible locations like the Arctic and energy-hungry nations like India and China.

A) More than have any of its competitors, Dynacorp, which will release its annual earnings report on Friday, is staking its future on the business of bringing shale gas from formerly inaccessible locations like the Arctic and energy-hungry nations like India and China.
B) More than has any of its competitors, Dynacorp, which will release its annual earnings report on Friday, has staked its future on the business of bringing shale gas from formerly inaccessible locations like the Arctic to energy-hungry nations like India and China.
C) More so than any of its competitors, Dynacorp, which will release its annual earnings report on Friday, is staking its future on the business of bringing shale gas from formerly inaccessible locations like the Arctic and energy-hungry nations such as India and China.
D) More than any of its competitors have, Dynacorp, which will release its annual earnings report on Friday, staked its future on the business of bringing shale gas from formerly inaccessible locations like the Arctic and energy-hungry nations such as India and China.
E) More than any of its competitors, Dynacorp, which will release its annual earnings report on Friday, is staking its future on the business of bringing shale gas from formerly inaccessible locations like the Arctic to energy-hungry nations like India and China.
Dear Mitch,

Here is the official explanation from Veritas.

"Answer E - The dominant decision point in this question is "and" vs. "to" in the back half of the sentence. Because of construction "bringing X from...", "to" is required to create a logical meaning, so the "and" choices (A, C, and D) are incorrect. Furthermore, the choices that include a verb ("has" or "have") in the beginning of the sentence in the modifier do not offer a direct verb for "has done what?", and so they are also incorrect. Choice E uses a proper modifier and the correct "to" connection, so it is correct."

According to the explanation above by Veritas, B is eliminated because choice include verb 'has' or 'have' without any any direct object. I think, there is ellipses which meaning is implied.
B) More than has stacked any of its competitors, Dynacorp, which will release its annual earnings report on Friday, has staked its future on the business of bringing shale gas from formerly inaccessible locations like the Arctic to energy-hungry nations like India and China.

1- Can you shed light on why choice B is incorrect ? Is 'has ' wrong'? does verb 'has stacked' wrong too?

2- When using 'any', does Any' take singular verb.? In some English forums, it is moot point. Every team has his point to use singular or plural verb?

Thanks
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Dec 30, 2017 11:08 pm
Mo2men wrote:1- Can you shed light on why choice B is incorrect ?
any of + PLURAL NOUN takes a PLURAL VERB.
Incorrect: Has any of the BOYS arrived?
Correct: HAVE any of the BOYS arrived?

B implies the following comparison:
More than has any of its competitors [staked], Dynacorp has staked.
The VERBed in red is omitted but implied.
Here, has staked (singular) does not agree with any of its competitors (plural).
Eliminate B.

Another issue:

Some verb forms consist of a helping verb + participle:
is running
have eaten

Here, is and have serve as helping verbs, while running and eaten serve as participles.
Rule: A participle may be omitted after a helping verb only if the participle appears earlier in the sentence.
In B, the omitted participle in red does not appear earlier in the sentence.
Eliminate B.

One final issue:

Whereas the verb in the original sentence (is staking) is in the present progressive tense, the verb in B (has staked) is in the present perfect tense.
Since the verb in the original sentence conveys a logical meaning, there is no justification for the change in tense in B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1