Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

No clue how to solve it

Expert replies
by adam007 » Mon Mar 03, 2008 7:01 am
Spent 1h and still no clue... Any help greatly appreciated!

Six people raced together. If the gold medal winner finished the race in 15 minutes, and no any two athletes finished the race in the same time, did the silver medal winner finish the race in less than 15 minutes and 40 seconds?

1). The average time they cost was 16 minute.

2). The last one TOOK 18 minutes, the silver winner TOOK 1MIN AND 21 SEC less than the fifth one , and the third one is one second quicker than the fourth one.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by blue_lotus » Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:05 am
Answer is C:

1. It says that the mean is 16 , this is not sufficient to conclude anything about the second place.
2. This gives information that the last one took 18 min and the 3 & 4 th are almost the same time.
- insufficient

But now we can combine both of the statement. I would recommend you draw a time line
15---------16--------------18
The above time line is showing the first and the last alsong with the median time.
We notice that first one is 1 min less than mean and last one is 2 min more than mean.

Therefore the difference(gain) is 2 min - 1 min = 1min, which has to be compensated between the other 4 people.

Now I will take a value to test whether having the second one as 15.40 is possible to compensate for the gain.
16-15.40 = 20 sec will be compensated. Still 40 sec needs to be comensated . Even if we take 3 and 4 near to 2
We wont be able to make it possible. Also person 5 cant be on the left hand side of mean as difference between
2 and 5 is 1.21

From the above experiment we conclude that the second person completed race within 15.40 second.


I am sure there would be an easier way to explain this.

Cheers,
Join the discussion

by adam007 » Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:45 am
thanks a lot!
Join the discussion

by xilef » Tue Mar 04, 2008 3:53 pm
another possible solution:


15+x+y+(y+1s)+(x+1m21s)+18=96

if we assume silver winner took 15m40s:

15+15m40s+y+(y+1s)+17m1s+18=96

2y=30m18s
y=15m9s so according to this 3rd place finished faster than second, therefore, second place must have finished faster than in 15m40s
Join the discussion

by adam007 » Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:17 pm
that's great explanation! many thanks!
Join the discussion