BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Newton public school CR

Expert replies
by aj5105 » Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:02 am
The number of applications for teaching positions in Newtown’s public schools was 5.7 percent lower in 1993 than in 1985 and 5.9 percent lower in 1994 than in 1985. Despite a steadily growing student population and an increasing number of teacher resignations, however, Newtown dose not face a teacher shortage in the late 1990’s.

Which of the following, if true, would contribute most to an explanation of the apparent discrepancy above?

A. Many of Newtown’s public school students do not graduate from high school.
B. New housing developments planned for Newtown are slated for occupancy in 1997 and are expected to increase the number of elementary school students in Newtown’s public schools by 12 percent.
C. The Newtown school board does not contemplate increasing the ratio of students to teachers in the 1990’s.
D. Teachers’ colleges in and near Newtown produced fewer graduates in 1994 than in 1993.
E. In 1993 Newtown’s public schools received 40 percent more applications for teaching positions than there were positions available.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by gg1 » Sat Jan 17, 2009 4:59 am
{E}
Join the discussion

by bmlaud » Sat Jan 17, 2009 10:20 am
A. Many of Newtown’s public school students do not graduate from high school. Irrelevant
B. New housing developments planned for Newtown are slated for occupancy in 1997 and are expected to increase the number of elementary school students in Newtown’s public schools by 12 percent. Doesn't tell anything about requirement of extra teachers.
C. The Newtown school board does not contemplate increasing the ratio of students to teachers in the 1990’s. Reverse Answer
D. Teachers’ colleges in and near Newtown produced fewer graduates in 1994 than in 1993. Irrelevant
E. In 1993 Newtown’s public schools received 40 percent more applications for teaching positions than there were positions available. It explains well that the school can get teachers whenever required.
Join the discussion

by Bidisha800 » Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:56 am
(E)
Drill baby drill !

GMATPowerPrep Test1= 740
GMATPowerPrep Test2= 760
Kaplan Diagnostic Test= 700
Kaplan Test1=600
Kalplan Test2=670
Kalplan Test3=570
Join the discussion

by vscid » Sun Jan 18, 2009 9:11 am
e for me 2!

oa?
The GMAT is indeed adaptable. Whenever I answer RC, it proficiently 'adapts' itself to mark my 'right' answer 'wrong'.
Join the discussion

by edwardyong » Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:14 pm
OA E
Join the discussion

by ssgmatter » Fri May 21, 2010 9:10 pm
aj5105 wrote:The number of applications for teaching positions in Newtown�s public schools was 5.7 percent lower in 1993 than in 1985 and 5.9 percent lower in 1994 than in 1985. Despite a steadily growing student population and an increasing number of teacher resignations, however, Newtown dose not face a teacher shortage in the late 1990�s.

Which of the following, if true, would contribute most to an explanation of the apparent discrepancy above?

A. Many of Newtown�s public school students do not graduate from high school.
B. New housing developments planned for Newtown are slated for occupancy in 1997 and are expected to increase the number of elementary school students in Newtown�s public schools by 12 percent.
C. The Newtown school board does not contemplate increasing the ratio of students to teachers in the 1990�s.
D. Teachers� colleges in and near Newtown produced fewer graduates in 1994 than in 1993.
E. In 1993 Newtown�s public schools received 40 percent more applications for teaching positions than there were positions available.
I am confused on C here....Can anyone please explain why C is right/wrong option here......It is very confusing....

Thanks!
Best-
Amit
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Fri May 21, 2010 10:30 pm
ssgmatter wrote:
aj5105 wrote:The number of applications for teaching positions in Newtown�s public schools was 5.7 percent lower in 1993 than in 1985 and 5.9 percent lower in 1994 than in 1985. Despite a steadily growing student population and an increasing number of teacher resignations, however, Newtown dose not face a teacher shortage in the late 1990�s.

Which of the following, if true, would contribute most to an explanation of the apparent discrepancy above?

A. Many of Newtown�s public school students do not graduate from high school.
B. New housing developments planned for Newtown are slated for occupancy in 1997 and are expected to increase the number of elementary school students in Newtown�s public schools by 12 percent.
C. The Newtown school board does not contemplate increasing the ratio of students to teachers in the 1990�s.
D. Teachers� colleges in and near Newtown produced fewer graduates in 1994 than in 1993.
E. In 1993 Newtown�s public schools received 40 percent more applications for teaching positions than there were positions available.
I am confused on C here....Can anyone please explain why C is right/wrong option here......It is very confusing....

Thanks!
C is wrong as
it says that The Newtown school board does not favored increasing the ratio of students to teachers in the 1990's.
its contradicting the argument by saying that there may be a shortage of teacher.
had it been the other way, it wud have the correct ans
Many of the great achievements of the world were accomplished by tired and discouraged men who kept on working
Join the discussion

by ssgmatter » Fri May 21, 2010 10:36 pm
thephoenix wrote:
ssgmatter wrote:
aj5105 wrote:The number of applications for teaching positions in Newtown�s public schools was 5.7 percent lower in 1993 than in 1985 and 5.9 percent lower in 1994 than in 1985. Despite a steadily growing student population and an increasing number of teacher resignations, however, Newtown dose not face a teacher shortage in the late 1990�s.

Which of the following, if true, would contribute most to an explanation of the apparent discrepancy above?

A. Many of Newtown�s public school students do not graduate from high school.
B. New housing developments planned for Newtown are slated for occupancy in 1997 and are expected to increase the number of elementary school students in Newtown�s public schools by 12 percent.
C. The Newtown school board does not contemplate increasing the ratio of students to teachers in the 1990�s.
D. Teachers� colleges in and near Newtown produced fewer graduates in 1994 than in 1993.
E. In 1993 Newtown�s public schools received 40 percent more applications for teaching positions than there were positions available.
I am confused on C here....Can anyone please explain why C is right/wrong option here......It is very confusing....

Thanks!
C is wrong as
it says that The Newtown school board does not favored increasing the ratio of students to teachers in the 1990's.
its contradicting the argument by saying that there may be a shortage of teacher.
had it been the other way, it wud have the correct ans
How can you say that C points to the shortage of teachers here....I am confused more now....
Best-
Amit
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Sat May 22, 2010 12:15 am
We have to reconcile that fact that there are fewer applicants for teaching jobs and an increase in demand for teachers with the assertion that there will be no shortage of teachers. How does C succeed in doing that?
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by ssgmatter » Sat May 22, 2010 5:14 am
kevincanspain wrote:We have to reconcile that fact that there are fewer applicants for teaching jobs and an increase in demand for teachers with the assertion that there will be no shortage of teachers. How does C succeed in doing that?
Makes sense!....somehow I think I was able to understand this....However, just trying to understand option C in context with the argument.....just trying to go little out of the boundaries just to explore the option C to widen my thought on a question like this.....

Your explanation makes the thing more clear now......student teacher ratio makes no sense in so far as reconciling the above two things that you mention

However, I am just trying to judge if the option C is a weakener or out of scope or what effect it has on the argument or is it just irrelevant...

Thanks!
Best-
Amit
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Sat May 22, 2010 5:59 am
If the board raised the ratio of students to teachers, such a action would preclude the need for teachers to replace the ones who resigned. C states that this possibility is being considered, thus eliminating a possible explanation
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion

by ssgmatter » Sat May 22, 2010 6:03 am
kevincanspain wrote:If the board raised the ratio of students to teachers, such a action would preclude the need for teachers to replace the ones who resigned. C states that this possibility is being considered, thus eliminating a possible explanation
I am little confused.....Is it like if the board raised the ratio or if the board does not raise the ratio

I think it should be If the board does not raise the ratio of student to teacher, then this would preclude the need for teachers to replace ones who resign. I think C considers this as a possibility so in a way not explian the paradox.....

Please correct me if I am faulty in my logic here....

Many thanks!
Best-
Amit
Join the discussion