Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

New question.... OG2017 Verbal Review....Weaken

Expert replies
by Mo2men » Sat Nov 12, 2016 6:58 am
In an experiment, volunteers walked individually through a dark, abandoned theater. Half of the volunteers had been told that the theater was haunted and the other half that it was under renovation. The first half reported significantly more unusual experiences than the second did. The researchers concluded that reports of encounters with ghosts and other supernatural entities generally result from prior expectations of such experiences.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the researchers’ reasoning?

A.None of the volunteers in the second half believed that the unusual experiences they reported were supernatural.
B.All of the volunteers in the first half believed that the researchers’ statement that the theater was haunted was a lie.
C.Before being told about the theater, the volunteers within each group varied considerably in their prior beliefs about supernatural experiences.
D.Each unusual experience reported by the volunteers had a cause that did not involve the supernatural.
E.The researchers did not believe that the theater was haunted.

Source: OG Verbal 2017

OA: B

Why D can't be the answer???
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Sat Nov 12, 2016 11:02 am
Mo2men wrote:In an experiment, volunteers walked individually through a dark, abandoned theater. Half of the volunteers had been told that the theater was haunted and the other half that it was under renovation. The first half reported significantly more unusual experiences than the second did. The researchers concluded that reports of encounters with ghosts and other supernatural entities generally result from prior expectations of such experiences.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the researchers’ reasoning?

A.None of the volunteers in the second half believed that the unusual experiences they reported were supernatural.
B.All of the volunteers in the first half believed that the researchers’ statement that the theater was haunted was a lie.
C.Before being told about the theater, the volunteers within each group varied considerably in their prior beliefs about supernatural experiences.
D.Each unusual experience reported by the volunteers had a cause that did not involve the supernatural.
E.The researchers did not believe that the theater was haunted.

Source: OG Verbal 2017

OA: B

Why D can't be the answer???
This is a causality argument. Expectations of paranormal activity ---> reports of paranormal activity

If we want to weaken this argument, we want to show that it isn't expectations of paranormal activity that lead to people having these strange experiences, but something else. D is at best irrelevant, and at worst, it's a strengthener. We're talking about how expectations shape people's experiences, not about whether these experiences are actual evidence of the supernatural. Put another way, if it's their expectations of paranormal activity that lead to them having these experiences, then it stands to reason that it's not actual paranormal activity that they're experiencing, but rather a psychological phenomenon. So, if anything, D is consistent with the argument.
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Nov 14, 2016 4:04 am
Mo2men wrote:In an experiment, volunteers walked individually through a dark, abandoned theater. Half of the volunteers had been told that the theater was haunted and the other half that it was under renovation. The first half reported significantly more unusual experiences than the second did. The researchers concluded that reports of encounters with ghosts and other supernatural entities generally result from prior expectations of such experiences.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the researchers’ reasoning?

A.None of the volunteers in the second half believed that the unusual experiences they reported were supernatural.
B.All of the volunteers in the first half believed that the researchers’ statement that the theater was haunted was a lie.
C.Before being told about the theater, the volunteers within each group varied considerably in their prior beliefs about supernatural experiences.
D.Each unusual experience reported by the volunteers had a cause that did not involve the supernatural.
E.The researchers did not believe that the theater was haunted.
I received a PM requesting that I comment.

Premise:
Half of the volunteers had been told that the theater was haunted, and this half reported significantly more unusual experiences.
Conclusion:
Reports of encounters with ghosts and other supernatural entities generally result from prior expectations of such experiences.

B: All of the volunteers in the first half believed that the researchers’ statement that the theater was haunted was a lie.
Since none of the volunteers who reported unusual experiences actually believed that the theater was haunted, none expected to see supernatural occurrences, WEAKENING the conclusion that reports of encounters with ghosts and other supernatural entities generally result from prior expectations of such experiences.

The correct answer is B.

D: Each unusual experience reported by the volunteers had a cause that did not involve the supernatural.
This option does not address WHY unusual experiences were reported.
Since it does not weaken the conclusion that the reports resulted from PRIOR EXPECTATIONS of such experiences, eliminate D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion