BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

New Media

Expert replies
by vidhya16 » Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:23 am
44. The news media is often accused of being willing to do anything for ratings. However, recent action by a television network indicates that the news media is sometimes guided by moral principle. This network had discovered through polling voters on the east coast that the Republican candidate for President had garnered enough votes to ensure victory before the polls closed on the west coast. However, the network withheld this information until the polls on the west coast closed so that the information would not affect the outcome of key congressional races.

Which one of the following most strengthens the argument?
(A) The network had endorsed the Republican candidate for President.
(B) The network expected its ratings to increase if it predicted the winner of the presidential race, and to decrease if did not predict the winner.
(C) A rival network did predict a winner of the presidential race before the polls on the west coast closed.
(D) The network believed that it would receive higher ratings by not predicting the winner of the presidential race.
(E) The network feared that predicting the winner of the presidential race could so anger Congress that it might enact legislation preventing all future polling outside of voting centers.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by akhilsuhag » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:16 am
Hi,

The argument: Network's do anything for ratings BUT recent example shows otherwise.

Example: Network did not predict a winner.

Strengthener would show that if they predicted the winner the ratings would rise but still they did not. Hence they were guided by more than just ratings.

IMO B

Please share the OA.

(A) seems like a good trap. As it might mean that the channel has other intentions (apart from morals or ratings). But the argument never says how the polls will be affected if the info is leaked or which way they might swing the remaining races or whatever.

I am no expert, but I do hope I am correct!!
Please press "thanks" if you think my post has helped you.. Cheers!!
Join the discussion

by StoneBlack » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:47 am
A and B are the probable answers.
I will go for A!!

Since A states that the network already endorsed the candidate and by revealing his position in east coast they could have influenced decision in west coast and their endorsed candidate would have won.

B states that the network expected a rise in ratings in case they predicted the correct winner but they cannot be sure that it will work out that way.

I don't know A looks a better answer to me.
Join the discussion

by akhilsuhag » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:52 am
This network had discovered through polling voters on the east coast that the Republican candidate for President had garnered enough votes to ensure victory before the polls closed on the west coast.

This is evidence and true that their prediction will be correct. The evidence in GMAT passages is always true in my opinion.

Eagerly awaiting the OA.
Please press "thanks" if you think my post has helped you.. Cheers!!
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:45 am
Mixed with B and C.

Will stick with B[/spoiler]
Join the discussion

by vidhya16 » Wed Aug 24, 2011 5:43 am
OA - B

Ta
Join the discussion