BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

network determined

Expert replies
by akhpad » Thu May 20, 2010 12:47 am
Source: KAPLAN 800

The network determined that seventeen commercials should be shown during a half-hour sitcom, while a one-hour drama can be expected to contain twenty-nine.

A: seventeen commercials should be shown during a half-hour sitcom
B: in a half-hour sitcom seventeen commercials will be shown
C: in a half-hour sitcom, seventeen commercials should be shown
D: seventeen commercials should be shown in a half-hour sitcom
E: seventeen commercials will be shown by a half-hour sitcom

OA: B

I couldn't able to eliminate.
Last edited by akhpad on Thu May 20, 2010 8:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by concept » Thu May 20, 2010 1:56 am
Parallelism is my explantion. Please correct me if I am wrong.

A will have X while B can be expected to contain Y - parallelism
Join the discussion

by akhpad » Thu May 20, 2010 8:15 pm
concept wrote:Parallelism is my explantion. Please correct me if I am wrong.

A will have X while B can be expected to contain Y - parallelism
If so ...
I believe that all the choices follow this parallelism.
Join the discussion

by thephoenix » Thu May 20, 2010 8:28 pm
issue is of correct comparison

a)seventeen commercials is compared to a one hour drama.........not a correct comparison
b)half hour sitcom is comapred to a one hour drama.............correct
c), seventeen commercials should be shown , ..........this is an essential information and should not be separated by comma
d)seventeen commercials is compared to a one hour drama.........not a correct comparison
e)seventeen commercials is compared to a one hour drama.........not a correct comparison
Many of the great achievements of the world were accomplished by tired and discouraged men who kept on working
Join the discussion

by akhpad » Thu May 20, 2010 8:43 pm
Thanks for details

In "a one-hour drama" => "one-hour" is adj and "drama" is noun
In "in a half-hour sitcom seventeen commercials" => "half-hour' is adj and "sitcom" is noun

this comparison is fine for me.

Is "seventeen commercials" a subject and "in a half-hour sitcom' is adj?
Join the discussion

by frank1 » Thu May 20, 2010 9:16 pm
B sounded like runoff sentence for me...

Is something being compared here..?

parallelism seems to be logic but still runoff
Join the discussion

by paridhi » Thu May 20, 2010 11:02 pm
akhp77 wrote:Source: KAPLAN 800

The network determined that seventeen commercials should be shown during a half-hour sitcom, while a one-hour drama can be expected to contain twenty-nine.

A: seventeen commercials should be shown during a half-hour sitcom
B: in a half-hour sitcom seventeen commercials will be shown
C: in a half-hour sitcom, seventeen commercials should be shown
D: seventeen commercials should be shown in a half-hour sitcom
E: seventeen commercials will be shown by a half-hour sitcom

OA: B

I couldn't able to eliminate.
I am confused. The sentence contains should be shown whereas B contains will be shown - doesn't it change the meaning of the sentence.
The network determined that something should be shown - means it is not necessarily currently true.

Please explain.
Join the discussion

by dkher » Thu May 20, 2010 11:26 pm
paridhi wrote:
akhp77 wrote:Source: KAPLAN 800

The network determined that seventeen commercials should be shown during a half-hour sitcom, while a one-hour drama can be expected to contain twenty-nine.

A: seventeen commercials should be shown during a half-hour sitcom
B: in a half-hour sitcom seventeen commercials will be shown
C: in a half-hour sitcom, seventeen commercials should be shown
D: seventeen commercials should be shown in a half-hour sitcom
E: seventeen commercials will be shown by a half-hour sitcom

OA: B

I couldn't able to eliminate.
I am confused. The sentence contains should be shown whereas B contains will be shown - doesn't it change the meaning of the sentence.
The network determined that something should be shown - means it is not necessarily currently true.

Please explain.


should be and can be should be parallel
One more thing if we say something in past for th future such as in this case determined then then future verb tense should be should or would
it should be during a half-hour sitcom and not in a half hour sitcom
Join the discussion

by KapTeacherEli » Mon May 24, 2010 12:39 pm
paridhi wrote: I am confused. The sentence contains should be shown whereas B contains will be shown - doesn't it change the meaning of the sentence.
The network determined that something should be shown - means it is not necessarily currently true.

Please explain.
I've been asked via PM to address this issue.

In common speech, we use 'should' to indicate probable but uncertain likelyhood. However, this usage is stylistically undesirable. On the GMAT, 'should' will be used to refer to the right, proper, or recommended course of action (rather than merely the likely one.)
Eli Meyer
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
Cambridge, MA
www.kaptest.com/gmat

ImageImageImage
Join the discussion

by tryingtocrack » Mon May 24, 2010 5:08 pm
The network determined that seventeen commercials should be shown during a half-hour sitcom, while a one-hour drama can be expected to contain twenty-nine.

A: seventeen commercials should be shown during a half-hour sitcom
B: in a half-hour sitcom seventeen commercials will be shown
C: in a half-hour sitcom, seventeen commercials should be shown
D: seventeen commercials should be shown in a half-hour sitcom
E: seventeen commercials will be shown by a half-hour sitcom

As already discussed earlier in this forum - Should is moral obligation .Eliminating A , C , D

Left with B and E . E is passive and changing the meaning .

So we are left with B
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1