BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Net gain or loss

Expert replies
by kaf » Thu Mar 26, 2009 5:53 am
Can you please help in explaining the solution to this problem

Ms. Adams sold two properties, X and Y, for $30,000 each. She sold property X for 20% more than she paid for it and sold property Y for 20% less than she paid for it. If expenses are disregarded, what was her total net gain or loss, if any, on the two properties?

A. Loss of $1,250
B. Loss of $2,500
C. Gain of $1,250
D. Gain of $2,500
E. There was neither a net gain nor a net loss

thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by DanaJ » Thu Mar 26, 2009 8:12 am
The selling price of property X is 20% more than what she paid for it, meaning that 30 000 = 120%*(price paid for X), making the price paid for X 30 000/1.2 = 25 000.
The selling price of property Y is 20% less than what she paid for it or 30 000 = 80%*(price paid for Y), making the price paid for Y 30 0000/0.8 = 37 500.
This means that she gained 5 000 from selling X, but she lost 7 500 from selling Y. At the end of the day, she lost 2 500.
Join the discussion

by kaf » Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:23 am
DanaJ

Please if you could explain step by step it will be very much appreciated

thanks
Join the discussion

by drphoebejigs » Thu Mar 26, 2009 1:07 pm
I don't think you can break it down more than Dana did, but I'll try. . .The underlying concept here is percent change.

The problem give us the selling price, so we need to find the original price of each property before their respective increase and decrease in price.

Step 1-The selling price of the first property is $30,000. this is the price AFTER an increase of 20%, so the original price is x times 1.20 since the price INCREASED 20%. That leaves us with x*1.20=30,000------->x=25,000. Thus, the price increased $5,000

Step 2-The selling price of the Property y is 30,000. This is the price AFTER a decrease of 20%, so the original price is y times .80 since 1.00-.20=.80. That leaves us with y*.80=30,000-------y=37,500. Thus the price decreased 75,00

Finally, we need to find out whether or not Ms. Adams made money. So we vet the two prices. 5000-7500=-2500. So overall,
she lost 2500.

This problem is a lot easier to manage if you make a table using the formula for percent change.
Join the discussion