BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Need help in analysing this one CR problem

Expert replies
by aimkp » Wed May 05, 2010 5:22 am
Hi All...

Need feedback in analysing below one & getting at right answer.


In the United States, vacationers account for more than half of all visitors to what are technically called "pure aquariums" but for fewer than one quarter of all visitors to zoos, which usually include a "zoo aquarium" of relatively modest scope.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the difference described above between visitors to zoos and visitors to pure aquariums?

(A) In cities that have both a zoo and a pure aquarium, local residents are twice as likely to visit the aquarium as they are to visit the zoo.

(B) Virtually all large metropolitan areas have zoos, whereas only a few large metropolitan areas have pure aquariums.

(C) Over the last ten years, newly constructed pure aquariums have outnumbered newly established zoos by a factor of two to one.

(D) People who visit a zoo in a given year are two times more likely to visit a pure aquarium that year than are people who do not visit a zoo.

(E) The zoo aquariums of zoos that are in the same city as a pure aquarium tend to be smaller than the aquariums of zoos that have no pure aquarium nearby.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by xyztroy » Wed May 05, 2010 7:54 am
must be B....more cities have zoos ....so more local ppl going to zoo..
Join the discussion

by paddle_sweep » Wed May 05, 2010 8:48 am
IMO it's D. Pls post OA.
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Wed May 05, 2010 9:57 am
I am on D too.
I think its mainly b/w A and D. A can be discarded coz it does not account for vacationers from all over the places rather talks only about local natives of the city. D talks in more generalized term "people".
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

by sakali » Wed May 05, 2010 2:41 pm
xyztroy wrote:must be B....more cities have zoos ....so more local ppl going to zoo..
Can't be "B" because the argument talks about the proportion of visitors to the zoo and the Aquarium. Not the number of visitors...so it doesn't really matter how many zoos or aquariums there are in a given city.
Join the discussion

by aimkp » Wed May 05, 2010 5:30 pm
Frnds ..


Ans . is B .. I think why vacationers are visiting to Pure Aquariums because there nos are few than zoos in other metropoitans.
Join the discussion

by yadav.rahul1234 » Thu May 06, 2010 9:48 am
Hi all,
I think the answer is D. Becsuse ti is only concerned with the proportion of visitors.
Join the discussion

by orel » Thu May 06, 2010 7:43 pm
Join the discussion

by paes » Thu May 06, 2010 9:13 pm
IMO : B

The argument is saying for vacationers. So with the assumption that vacationers mean the person who have come from out of the city, B holds true.

IMO D
If vacationers mean anybody visiting to zoo.
Join the discussion

by orel » Thu May 06, 2010 9:39 pm
paes wrote:IMO : B

The argument is saying for vacationers. So with the assumption that vacationers mean the person who have come from out of the city, B holds true.

IMO D
If vacationers mean anybody visiting to zoo.
But B doesn't say anything about visitors....
Join the discussion