BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Need help in analysing this one CR problem

Expert replies
by aimkp » Wed May 05, 2010 5:22 am
Hi All...

Need feedback in analysing below one & getting at right answer.


In the United States, vacationers account for more than half of all visitors to what are technically called "pure aquariums" but for fewer than one quarter of all visitors to zoos, which usually include a "zoo aquarium" of relatively modest scope.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the difference described above between visitors to zoos and visitors to pure aquariums?

(A) In cities that have both a zoo and a pure aquarium, local residents are twice as likely to visit the aquarium as they are to visit the zoo.

(B) Virtually all large metropolitan areas have zoos, whereas only a few large metropolitan areas have pure aquariums.

(C) Over the last ten years, newly constructed pure aquariums have outnumbered newly established zoos by a factor of two to one.

(D) People who visit a zoo in a given year are two times more likely to visit a pure aquarium that year than are people who do not visit a zoo.

(E) The zoo aquariums of zoos that are in the same city as a pure aquarium tend to be smaller than the aquariums of zoos that have no pure aquarium nearby.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by xyztroy » Wed May 05, 2010 7:54 am
must be B....more cities have zoos ....so more local ppl going to zoo..
Join the discussion

by paddle_sweep » Wed May 05, 2010 8:48 am
IMO it's D. Pls post OA.
Join the discussion

by sumanr84 » Wed May 05, 2010 9:57 am
I am on D too.
I think its mainly b/w A and D. A can be discarded coz it does not account for vacationers from all over the places rather talks only about local natives of the city. D talks in more generalized term "people".
I am on a break !!
Join the discussion

by sakali » Wed May 05, 2010 2:41 pm
xyztroy wrote:must be B....more cities have zoos ....so more local ppl going to zoo..
Can't be "B" because the argument talks about the proportion of visitors to the zoo and the Aquarium. Not the number of visitors...so it doesn't really matter how many zoos or aquariums there are in a given city.
Join the discussion

by aimkp » Wed May 05, 2010 5:30 pm
Frnds ..


Ans . is B .. I think why vacationers are visiting to Pure Aquariums because there nos are few than zoos in other metropoitans.
Join the discussion

by yadav.rahul1234 » Thu May 06, 2010 9:48 am
Hi all,
I think the answer is D. Becsuse ti is only concerned with the proportion of visitors.
Join the discussion

by orel » Thu May 06, 2010 7:43 pm
Join the discussion

by paes » Thu May 06, 2010 9:13 pm
IMO : B

The argument is saying for vacationers. So with the assumption that vacationers mean the person who have come from out of the city, B holds true.

IMO D
If vacationers mean anybody visiting to zoo.
Join the discussion

by orel » Thu May 06, 2010 9:39 pm
paes wrote:IMO : B

The argument is saying for vacationers. So with the assumption that vacationers mean the person who have come from out of the city, B holds true.

IMO D
If vacationers mean anybody visiting to zoo.
But B doesn't say anything about visitors....
Join the discussion