BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 28
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

15 live classes from Sep 28, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Need explanation

Expert replies
by joannabanana » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:10 am
Image

I was sure the answer was c. Can someone (preferably an "expert") please give me a detailed explanation of why c is incorrect and how I can avoid such mistakes in the future?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Tue Oct 26, 2010 5:16 am
i m not expert my friend but i will try to explain

increase in religiosity in college in last ten years.......this must be the reason for reduction in the cheating

find the option which oppose this

1.doest not say about cheating out
2.does not say about religiosity
3.this may be the reason for reduction in cheating wins
4.out of scope
5.but there is a reduction in cheating out
A SMALL TOWN GUY
Join the discussion

by rkanthilal » Tue Oct 26, 2010 6:42 am
Hey Joanna - I also am not an expert but here are my two cents.

The argument proposes a causal relationship. The "cause" is increased religiosity. Note: The cause is not students attending church. It is "religiosity" or a spirit of faith. The "effect" is lower cheating.

You can weaken this conclusion by showing that the cause/effect relationship is not valid or by finding an alternative cause for the lower cheating.

Answer C looks attractive as an alternative cause but the dates don't match up. The change to proctor exams happened fifteen years ago and the reduction in cheating is "recent"

Answer A shows that the cause/effect relationship may not be valid. If the students attend church only for social reasons then they do not have increased religiosity. Therefore, the conclusion falls apart that religiosity is the reason for less cheating.

Hope that helps...
Join the discussion