BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

<need expert help> SC

Expert replies
by voodoo_child » Sat Nov 26, 2011 1:13 pm
Stymieing the Armada's plans to meet up with the Duke of Parma's army off the coast of Flanders in the Spanish Netherlands, the reason for the defeat of the Spanish Armada was not only due to gale winds that favored the British but also the sacrificing of eight war ships as "fireships," vessels filled with pitch, brimstone, gunpowder, and tar and sent downwind toward the closely-anchored Spanish fleet.

a) Stymieing the Armada's plans to meet up with the Duke of Parma's army off the coast of Flanders in the Spanish Netherlands, the reason for the defeat of the Spanish Armada was not only due to gale winds that favored the British but also the sacrificing
b) The defeat of the Spanish Armada, which stymied the Armada's plans to meet up with the Duke of Parma's army off the coast of Flanders in the Spanish Netherlands, was not only due to gale winds that favored the British but also the sacrificing
c) The defeat of the Spanish Armada, which stymied the Armada's plans to meet up with the Duke of Parma's army off the coast of Flanders in the Spanish Netherlands, was not only due to gale winds that favored the British but also due to the sacrificing
d) Stymieing the Armada's plans to meet up with the Duke of Parma's army off the coast of Flanders in the Spanish Netherlands, the reason for the defeat of the Spanish Armada was not only gale winds that favored the British but also the sacrifice
e) Stymieing the Armada's plans to meet up with the Duke of Parma's army off the coast of Flanders in the Spanish Netherlands, the defeat of the Spanish Armada was due not only to gale winds that favored the British but also to the sacrifice

OA - E


Question :

(I) I am confused about "Stymieing the Armada's plans to do X, the defeat of the Spanish Armada ...."

Here, since the introductory modifier is a participial modifier, don't we need an actor after the comma?

For instance, Stymieing at every turn, my brother waged a war with me. Here, my brother did "stymieing".

Am I correct?

(II) the official explanation says that "in C - The use of a "which" modifier (which must touch the thing that it modifies) implies that the Spanish Armada, not its defeat, stymied plans."

Why can't the "which" in C) refer to "the defeat of Spanish A" ? Can you please help me?

Voodoo Child[/list]
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by lunarpower » Sat Dec 10, 2011 5:36 am
i received a PM regarding this thread.
voodoo_child wrote:(I) I am confused about "Stymieing the Armada's plans to do X, the defeat of the Spanish Armada ...."

Here, since the introductory modifier is a participial modifier, don't we need an actor after the comma?
yes, but that "actor"/subject doesn't have to be a person; it just has to be whoever or whatever did the action described by the -ING construction.
here, then, the issue is this: WHO or WHAT stymied the armada's plans?
in the context of the sentence, the answer to that question is "the defeat of the armada". so that part is fine.

(II) the official explanation says that "in C - The use of a "which" modifier (which must touch the thing that it modifies) implies that the Spanish Armada, not its defeat, stymied plans."

Why can't the "which" in C) refer to "the defeat of Spanish A" ? Can you please help me?
you are correct; the "which" in that choice is fine. it is possible for "which" to refer to (noun + prep phrase).

the biggest problem i see in that choice is the use of "sacrificing" instead of the dedicated noun "sacrifice". see here:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/parallelism- ... tml#377403
because the sentence requires a noun to represent the action of sacrificing -- and because that noun is in parallel to another noun -- we should use the dedicated noun "sacrifice", not the gerund "sacrificing".
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

by ranjeet75 » Sun Dec 11, 2011 7:31 am
[quote]voodoo_child wrote:
(I) I am confused about "Stymieing the Armada's plans to do X, the defeat of the Spanish Armada ...."

Here, since the introductory modifier is a participial modifier, don't we need an actor after the comma?
yes, but that "actor"/subject doesn't have to be a person; it just has to be whoever or whatever did the action described by the -ING construction.
here, then, the issue is this: WHO or WHAT stymied the armada's plans?
in the context of the sentence, the answer to that question is "the defeat of the armada". so that part is fine. [/quote]

I could not understand how "the defeat" stymied the "Armada's plan" and therefore how the the modifier is correct in the sentence?

In C, the noun "sacrifice" would be better than the gerund. It's ok.
Join the discussion

by lunarpower » Sun Dec 11, 2011 9:26 pm
ranjeet75 wrote:I could not understand how "the defeat" stymied the "Armada's plan" and therefore how the the modifier is correct in the sentence?
because it was defeated in this particular incident, the armada was not able to carry out the rest of its plan. therefore, the defeat stymied (= hampered, inhibited, prevented) the overall plan.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1