Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Need a little less wordy and grammatical explanation to this

Expert replies
by ChessWriter » Sat Jan 07, 2012 5:31 am
A certain school's admissions policy requires of both undergraduate and graduate schools that academic prerequisites be the same for programs historically entered by male students as for programs requiring equivalent academic rigor that are usually entered by female students.

A)that academic prerequisites be the same for programs historically entered by male students as for programs requiring equivalent academic rigor that are
B)that academic prerequisites for programs historically entered by male students should be the same as for a program requiring equivalent academic rigor
C)to demand academic prerequisites the same in programs historically entered by male students as in programs of equivalent academic rigor that are
D)to demand academic prerequisites the same apart from whether a program was historically entered by male students or is one demanding equivalent academic rigor
E)to demand academic prerequisites as much for programs historically entered by men as for a program demanding equivalent academic rigor
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by ChessWriter » Sat Jan 07, 2012 5:35 am
The explanation to this question uses too many grammar related terms like "subjunctives", "infinitives" etc. This confuses me no end.I am already scoring above 680 in practise tests without preparation. I do not want to complicate things for myself by trying to learn grammar !

So, is there an easy way understand the nuances of the correct Answer without getting into grammar and what not. (I will post the answer and the convoluted explanation for it tommorrow)
Join the discussion

by LalaB » Sat Jan 07, 2012 6:38 am
@ChessWriter, in SC u need to know the logic and grammar. so, u have to learn some grammar rules to beat the SC section. and btw, GMAT tests not many grammar rules. so if u want to get 700+, u better know these rules.

as for the sentence above, it is a pure test of subjunctive mood (the word "require" indicates it)
Join the discussion

by ChessWriter » Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:46 pm
Read the Original Sentence Carefully, Looking for Errors:

The moment you see a word like "require" (or "suggest," "insist," "recommend," "mandate," etc.) you should think: "Subjunctive! I need to use 'that' and then the infinitive form of the verb." Here, the first word of the underlined portion is "that," which is exactly what we what. Further, the word "be" (in the phrase" prerequisites be the same") is, as it should be, in the infinitive tense. This is a long sentence, with many clauses and pauses, but there isn't anything grammatically wrong with it. Our goal will be to determine if any of the other choices are better stylistically.

Scan and Group the Answer Choices:

A quick scan of the choices reveals that choices (A) and (B) both begin with the word "that," while the other three choices begin "to demand." This makes a clear 3-2 split.

Eliminate Wrong Answer Choices:

Let's look at the use of the phrase "to demand" in choices (C), (D), and (E) to see if we can keep those choices or if we should eliminate them.

The word "demand," just like the word "insist," creates a subjunctive mood. We'd have to say, "demand that academic prerequisites be the same," and none of these three choices does that. Further, it's really not idiomatically correct to say "requires of schools… to demand." It's ok to say "requires schools to demand," but the word "of" ruins the whole thing.

There are other problems with these choices. Choice (C) uses the phrase "prerequisites … in" which is incorrect; the proper idiom is "prerequisites for." Choice (D) changes the simple "same for this as for that" construction of the original sentence to a wordy and confusing phrase: "the same apart from whether it was ___ or is ____." This confuses the issue and, what's more, isn't even parallel. Choice (E) changes the meaning of the sentence. The sentence is about the fact that the prerequisites should be the same for both types of programs, while choice (E) changes it to say that prerequisites should be requires just as much for both types of programs. Each is clearly wrong.

Evaluating choice (B), we see that it inserts the would "should," so that it reads "should be the same" rather than simply "be the same." Remember, the subjunctive requires the use of the infinitive tense, which means that the word should is wrong here.

Since each choice introduces more errors, Answer Choice (A) is correct. The sentence was correct as written, as happens around one-fifth of the time.
Join the discussion

by ChessWriter » Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:46 pm
Read the Original Sentence Carefully, Looking for Errors:

The moment you see a word like "require" (or "suggest," "insist," "recommend," "mandate," etc.) you should think: "Subjunctive! I need to use 'that' and then the infinitive form of the verb." Here, the first word of the underlined portion is "that," which is exactly what we what. Further, the word "be" (in the phrase" prerequisites be the same") is, as it should be, in the infinitive tense. This is a long sentence, with many clauses and pauses, but there isn't anything grammatically wrong with it. Our goal will be to determine if any of the other choices are better stylistically.

Scan and Group the Answer Choices:

A quick scan of the choices reveals that choices (A) and (B) both begin with the word "that," while the other three choices begin "to demand." This makes a clear 3-2 split.

Eliminate Wrong Answer Choices:

Let's look at the use of the phrase "to demand" in choices (C), (D), and (E) to see if we can keep those choices or if we should eliminate them.

The word "demand," just like the word "insist," creates a subjunctive mood. We'd have to say, "demand that academic prerequisites be the same," and none of these three choices does that. Further, it's really not idiomatically correct to say "requires of schools… to demand." It's ok to say "requires schools to demand," but the word "of" ruins the whole thing.

There are other problems with these choices. Choice (C) uses the phrase "prerequisites … in" which is incorrect; the proper idiom is "prerequisites for." Choice (D) changes the simple "same for this as for that" construction of the original sentence to a wordy and confusing phrase: "the same apart from whether it was ___ or is ____." This confuses the issue and, what's more, isn't even parallel. Choice (E) changes the meaning of the sentence. The sentence is about the fact that the prerequisites should be the same for both types of programs, while choice (E) changes it to say that prerequisites should be requires just as much for both types of programs. Each is clearly wrong.

Evaluating choice (B), we see that it inserts the would "should," so that it reads "should be the same" rather than simply "be the same." Remember, the subjunctive requires the use of the infinitive tense, which means that the word should is wrong here.

Since each choice introduces more errors, Answer Choice (A) is correct. The sentence was correct as written, as happens around one-fifth of the time. Read the Original Sentence Carefully, Looking for Errors:

The moment you see a word like "require" (or "suggest," "insist," "recommend," "mandate," etc.) you should think: "Subjunctive! I need to use 'that' and then the infinitive form of the verb." Here, the first word of the underlined portion is "that," which is exactly what we what. Further, the word "be" (in the phrase" prerequisites be the same") is, as it should be, in the infinitive tense. This is a long sentence, with many clauses and pauses, but there isn't anything grammatically wrong with it. Our goal will be to determine if any of the other choices are better stylistically.

Scan and Group the Answer Choices:

A quick scan of the choices reveals that choices (A) and (B) both begin with the word "that," while the other three choices begin "to demand." This makes a clear 3-2 split.

Eliminate Wrong Answer Choices:

Let's look at the use of the phrase "to demand" in choices (C), (D), and (E) to see if we can keep those choices or if we should eliminate them.

The word "demand," just like the word "insist," creates a subjunctive mood. We'd have to say, "demand that academic prerequisites be the same," and none of these three choices does that. Further, it's really not idiomatically correct to say "requires of schools… to demand." It's ok to say "requires schools to demand," but the word "of" ruins the whole thing.

There are other problems with these choices. Choice (C) uses the phrase "prerequisites … in" which is incorrect; the proper idiom is "prerequisites for." Choice (D) changes the simple "same for this as for that" construction of the original sentence to a wordy and confusing phrase: "the same apart from whether it was ___ or is ____." This confuses the issue and, what's more, isn't even parallel. Choice (E) changes the meaning of the sentence. The sentence is about the fact that the prerequisites should be the same for both types of programs, while choice (E) changes it to say that prerequisites should be requires just as much for both types of programs. Each is clearly wrong.

Evaluating choice (B), we see that it inserts the would "should," so that it reads "should be the same" rather than simply "be the same." Remember, the subjunctive requires the use of the infinitive tense, which means that the word should is wrong here.

Since each choice introduces more errors, Answer Choice (A) is correct. The sentence was correct as written, as happens around one-fifth of the time.
Join the discussion