BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Nature of CAT

Expert replies
by andy9923 » Fri Aug 01, 2008 10:47 am
Hi all,

A thought just came to my head yesterday. Is it possible to get a decent score on the GMAT by purposely guessing/skipping a chunk of questions in the beginning and answering everything else correctly? With the spirit of the GMAT being that it can reveal your true abilities by selecting question difficulty adaptively, wouldn't it be fair to say that there should be a cutoff point in the number of questions you can get wrong but still be able to recover lost grounds? If so, can that be used to the your advantage by skipping/guessing a few questions in the beginning since that can give you more time to figure out those real difficult ones (relative to your testing level) towards the end?

I thought about this after looking at analyzing score on a MGMAT CAT i took recently. Please shed some light if the real GMAT is different.

Thanks

andrew
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

by missionmba » Fri Aug 01, 2008 11:31 am
IMO:
in the starting the test tries to determine a tenetative score from the first 10 -15 ques. later on it just tries to determine the actual score based on the difficulty of question answered.

In the starting the tentative score varies a lot (ex. 40-60 points) but later on in the test this variation starts reducing (ex. 10-20).

So it depends on the difficulty of question which u are answering.

Moreover, one should avoid guessing in series of ques. If u get more ques worng in a series the score will drop and then it will take quiet some time to recover.
Mission Mba

Everyone has a will to win but very few have the will to prepare to win
Join the discussion

Re: Nature of CAT

by Ian Stewart » Fri Aug 01, 2008 4:59 pm
andy9923 wrote:Hi all,

A thought just came to my head yesterday. Is it possible to get a decent score on the GMAT by purposely guessing/skipping a chunk of questions in the beginning and answering everything else correctly? With the spirit of the GMAT being that it can reveal your true abilities by selecting question difficulty adaptively, wouldn't it be fair to say that there should be a cutoff point in the number of questions you can get wrong but still be able to recover lost grounds? If so, can that be used to the your advantage by skipping/guessing a few questions in the beginning since that can give you more time to figure out those real difficult ones (relative to your testing level) towards the end?

I thought about this after looking at analyzing score on a MGMAT CAT i took recently. Please shed some light if the real GMAT is different.

Thanks

andrew
It would require a long post (and still probably wouldn't be too illuminating) to explain how the GMAT scoring algorithm works, but I'd make two points:

-don't trust anything you conclude from test prep company tests. As far as I know, no test prep company simulates (or even claims to simulate) the GMAT scoring algorithm;

-answering questions intentionally incorrectly is absolutely the worst thing you can do on the GMAT. The time you save is worth far less than you might think, and you will simply kill your score by answering a series of questions randomly, unless you are extraordinarily lucky.

ETS ran a study about the GRE test, which is reasonably similar to the GMAT, except that each section is scored on the 800 scale. In an experiment, they gave a pool of test-takers 50% more time to finish the math section of the test- that's like having three minutes per question instead of two on the GMAT. By how much did scores improve? By 7 points on the /800 scale- almost a negligible amount. Time isn't worth as much as you might think, and correct answers, especially on difficult questions, are worth more than you might think. It isn't worthwhile answering questions incorrectly in the hope that you'll save time on the test.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com
Join the discussion