Option A - Irrelevant reference
This option gave an insight into 'an inexperience Shiquez successor' and this is not in correlation with the question. The question we need to draw a conclusion is centered around Shiquez dictatorship and the rise of democracy after he's gone! This option is INCORRECT
Option B - Inapposite and out of context
Yes, the country citizens opposed Shiquez's dictatorship, however, this option suggests that some of the citizens compromised! Not at any point in time was that made in the question. Also, there was no statement on 'well-organized majority!' Option B is out of place and INCORRECT
Option C - Near but incomplete ratiocination
This option made a categorical statement of finding a democratic leader immediately upon Shiquez's departure, however, that is not entirely true. What the question pointed out was that 'democracy is almost certain to arise when Shiquez is gone, NOT an immediate successor.
Option D - The best conclusion with logical syllogism!
This option correctly pointed out the conclusion in the question. The opposition to the dictator policies is synonymous with support for democratic rule! meaning when all weight is thrown against the military, then democracy is craved for! This option is CORRECT
Option E - Out of point and incoherence!
This option does not follow suit because what is being discussed in this option is how to avoid political influence from outside the nation. However, this does not reach a conclusion about 'democracy is almost certain and about Shiques's rule!