Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 1 and Nov 21. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

National Science Foundation

Expert replies
by j_shreyans » Sat Aug 15, 2015 9:47 am
According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were 198,113 female science and engineering graduate students, almost 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as much as 1981.


A)twice as much as 1981

B)twice as many as 1981

C)double the figure for 1981

D)double what it was in 1981

E)a number double that of 1981’s


OAC

I just want to know why B is wrong.

Experts please advise.

Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Aug 15, 2015 2:52 pm
j_shreyans wrote:According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were 198,113 female science and engineering graduate students, almost 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as much as 1981.


A)twice as much as 1981

B)twice as many as 1981

C)double the figure for 1981

D)double what it was in 1981

E)a number double that of 1981’s
In A, twice as much as 1981 seems to compare a percentage to a year.
Eliminate A.

In B, twice as many as 1981 seems to compare a percentage to a year.
Eliminate B.

In D, it (singular) cannot be used to refer to 42% of graduate students (plural).
Eliminate D.

In E, that of 1981's is an error of redundancy. The possessive construction 1981's is not necessary; that of 1981 would be sufficient all on its own.
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by j_shreyans » Sun Aug 16, 2015 6:59 am
Hi GMATGuru ,

Thanks for your reply, but still I need a more explanation to eliminate option B. It would be more helpful if explain with example.

Please advise.

Thanks in advance.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Aug 16, 2015 7:28 am
j_shreyans wrote:Hi GMATGuru ,

Thanks for your reply, but still I need a more explanation to eliminate option B. It would be more helpful if explain with example.

Please advise.

Thanks in advance.
B: 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as many as 1981.
Implied comparison:
42% of the graduate STUDENTS were twice as many as 1981.
Here, PEOPLE (42% of the graduate students) are illogically compared to a YEAR (1981).
Eliminate B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Sun Aug 23, 2015 10:49 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
j_shreyans wrote:According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were 198,113 female science and engineering graduate students, almost 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as much as 1981.


A)twice as much as 1981

B)twice as many as 1981

C)double the figure for 1981

D)double what it was in 1981

E)a number double that of 1981’s
In A, twice as much as 1981 seems to compare a percentage to a year.
Eliminate A.

In B, twice as many as 1981 seems to compare a percentage to a year.
Eliminate B.

In D, it (singular) cannot be used to refer to 42% of graduate students (plural).
Eliminate D.

In E, that of 1981's is an error of redundancy. The possessive construction 1981's is not necessary; that of 1981 would be sufficient all on its own.
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is C.
Hi Mitch

Somehow the choice C gives me the feeling of a run on sentence as it seems that a proper conjunction is missing somewhere.
It just doesn't sound correct.

Your thoughts please.
Join the discussion