BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

National Science Foundation

Expert replies
by j_shreyans » Sat Aug 15, 2015 9:47 am
According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were 198,113 female science and engineering graduate students, almost 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as much as 1981.


A)twice as much as 1981

B)twice as many as 1981

C)double the figure for 1981

D)double what it was in 1981

E)a number double that of 1981's


OAC

I just want to know why B is wrong.

Experts please advise.

Thanks.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Aug 15, 2015 2:52 pm
j_shreyans wrote:According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were 198,113 female science and engineering graduate students, almost 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as much as 1981.


A)twice as much as 1981

B)twice as many as 1981

C)double the figure for 1981

D)double what it was in 1981

E)a number double that of 1981's
In A, twice as much as 1981 seems to compare a percentage to a year.
Eliminate A.

In B, twice as many as 1981 seems to compare a percentage to a year.
Eliminate B.

In D, it (singular) cannot be used to refer to 42% of graduate students (plural).
Eliminate D.

In E, that of 1981's is an error of redundancy. The possessive construction 1981's is not necessary; that of 1981 would be sufficient all on its own.
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by j_shreyans » Sun Aug 16, 2015 6:59 am
Hi GMATGuru ,

Thanks for your reply, but still I need a more explanation to eliminate option B. It would be more helpful if explain with example.

Please advise.

Thanks in advance.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Aug 16, 2015 7:28 am
j_shreyans wrote:Hi GMATGuru ,

Thanks for your reply, but still I need a more explanation to eliminate option B. It would be more helpful if explain with example.

Please advise.

Thanks in advance.
B: 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as many as 1981.
Implied comparison:
42% of the graduate STUDENTS were twice as many as 1981.
Here, PEOPLE (42% of the graduate students) are illogically compared to a YEAR (1981).
Eliminate B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Sun Aug 23, 2015 10:49 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
j_shreyans wrote:According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were 198,113 female science and engineering graduate students, almost 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as much as 1981.


A)twice as much as 1981

B)twice as many as 1981

C)double the figure for 1981

D)double what it was in 1981

E)a number double that of 1981's
In A, twice as much as 1981 seems to compare a percentage to a year.
Eliminate A.

In B, twice as many as 1981 seems to compare a percentage to a year.
Eliminate B.

In D, it (singular) cannot be used to refer to 42% of graduate students (plural).
Eliminate D.

In E, that of 1981's is an error of redundancy. The possessive construction 1981's is not necessary; that of 1981 would be sufficient all on its own.
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is C.
Hi Mitch

Somehow the choice C gives me the feeling of a run on sentence as it seems that a proper conjunction is missing somewhere.
It just doesn't sound correct.

Your thoughts please.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1